. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Jul 18;164:107042. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107042

Table 4:

Comparison of high-freezing Fmr1 KO mice only. Even when accounting for Fmr1 KO mice that froze to low levels during fear conditioned training, Fmr1 KO mice still froze significantly less during Tone recall and Context + Tone recall compared to WT mice.

	Mean %		Statistic(df)	Effect Size	95% CI
Hi Freezers: Training
	WT FrC	Fmr1 KO FrC
CS-US 4	58.40	54.03	t(44) = 0.68	r = 0.10	0.37 – 0.19
CS-US 5	74.21	71.64	t(44) = 0.40	r = 0.06	0.34 – (−0.23)

Hi Freezers: Recall
	WT FrC	Fmr1 KO FrC
Tone	22.2	8.5	t(44) = 2.61 ^*	r = 0.36	0.59 – 0.09
Context	37.5	28.5	t(44) = 1.71	r = 0.25	0.49 – (−0.037)
Context + Tone	75	51.7	t(44) = 4.43 ^***	r = 0.55	0.72 – 0.32

( p = 0.05

^**

p = 0.01

^***

p =/< 0.001)