Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Jul 18;164:107042. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107042

Table 6:

Details of statistics for PV, PNN and PV/PNN density in auditory cortex.

A1 Cell Density Main Effect Statistic (df) Effect Size (ŋ2) 95% CI 2-Cond Test (ŋ2 effect size)
PV
Conditioning F(2,100) = 5.47, p = 0.0056 0.10 0.21 – 0.01 FrC v Nv* (0.08)
Superficial FrC v C** (0.17)
Genotype F(1,100) = 0.13, p = 0.71 0.001 0.05 – 0.0
Conditioning F(2,100) = 2.85, p = 0.062 0.05 0.15 – 0.0 FrC v Nv (0.02)
Deep FrC v C* (0.11)
Genotype F(1,100) = 0.27, p = 0.60 0.003 0.05 – 0.0

PNN
Conditioning F(2,100) = 7.07, p = 0.0013 0.12 0.24 – 0.02 WT only
Superficial C v Nv*** (0.62)
FrC v Nv* (0.46)
Genotype F(1,100) = 10.6, p = 0.0015 0.09 0.21 – 0.01
Conditioning F(2,100) = 4.28, p = 0.016 0.07 0.18 – 0.0 C v Nv* (0.08)
Deep FrC v C* (0.09)
Genotype F(1,100) = 11.11, p = 0.0012 0.10 0.22 – 0.02

PV+PNN +
Superficial Conditioning F(2,100) = 0.38, p = 0.68 0.007 0.05 – 0.0
Genotype F(1,100) = 1.61, p = 0.21 0.01 0.09 – 0.0
Deep Conditioning F(2,100) = 0.18, p = 0.84 0.003 0.04 – 0.0
Genotype F(1,100) = 1.16, p = 0.28 0.01 0.08 – 0.0

PV-PNN +
Superficial Conditioning F(1,100) = 4.1, p = 0.046 0.04 0.13 – 0.0
Deep Conditioning F(1,100) = 5.65, p = 0.019 0.05 0.16 – 0.0

PV+PNN −
Superficial FrC v Nv* (0.09)
FrC v C*** (0.19)
Deep FrC v C*** (0.18)
*

( p = 0.05

**

p = 0.01

***

p < 0.001)