Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;93(8):955–963. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01536-3

Table 4.

Linear regression coefficients for differences in burnout and distress between non-shift workers (4275) (reference) and a subsample of 5-shift workers (1428) stratified by satisfaction with shift schedule and impact of shift schedule on private life

Regression coefficient (95% confidence interval)
Burnout exhaustion Burnout distance Burnout competence Distress
Satisfaction with shift schedule
 Non-shift worker ref ref ref ref
 Satisfied shift workers Model 1 0.1 ( 0.7 to 0.8) 1.5 (−2.4 to − 0.7) 0.1 ( 0.7 to 0.8) 1.0 ( 1.9 to 2.1)
Model 2  0.2 ( 0.9 to 0.5) 1.8 (−2.7 to − 1.0) 0.8 (−1.5 to − 0.1) 0.3 ( 0.8 to 1.5)
 Dissatisfied shift workers Model 1 7.7 (5.8 to 9.5) 6.7 (4.8 to 9.0)* 5.1 (3.3 to 6.9) 8.3 (5.5 to 11.1)
Model 2 6.3 (4.6 to 8.0) 5.2 (3.2 to 7.1) 3.6 (1.9 to 5.3) 6.1 (3.4 to 8.8)
Impact shift schedule on commitments/sport/hobby’s
 Non-shift worker ref ref ref ref
 Shift workers experiencing no impact Model 1 1.1 (−1.9 to − 0.2) 2.5 (−3.5 to − 1.5) 1.2 (−2.1 to − 0.4)  0.8 ( 2.1 to 0.5)
Model 2 0.9 (−1.7 to − 0.1) 2.2 (−3.1 to − 1.2) 1.5 (−2.3 to − 0.6)  0.8 ( 2.1 to 0.5)
 Shift workers experiencing impact Model 1 5.3 (4.1 to 6.4) 3.8 (2.4 to 5.1) 4.5 (3.3 to 5.7)* 7.3 (5.5 to 9.1)
Model 2 3.8 (2.7 to 4.9) 1.7 (0.4 to 2.9) 2.7 (1.6 to 3.8) 4.9 (3.2 to 6.6)

Model 1: adjusted for age, gender

Model 2: education, marital status, living with children, working hours/week, work pressure, and workplace social support

Boldface indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05)

Burnout was measured with the Dutch Maslach Burnout Inventory; higher scores indicating burnout. Distress was measured with the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire; higher scores indicating distress

*Significant interaction with age (interaction P value < 0.05)