Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;21(3):158–176. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.82596.1024

Table 2.

Dental caries status and DMFT/dmft data using Random Effect Meta-Analysis.

Dental caries index Number of studies Prevalence % Confidence interval 95% (CI%95) Heterogeneity index I2 (%)
Dental caries
Total 54 72.8 69.2- 76.4 99.1%
Boys 22 75.3 70.6- 80 97.55%
Girls 22 74.9 70.3 – 79.5 97.7%
DT 13 59.0 44.0 – 73.0 99.7%
MT 10 6.0 4.0 – 8.0 92.3%
FT 10 21.0 12.0 – 30.0 99.1%
dt 7 70.0 53.0 – 87.0 99.6%
mt 6 0.9 4.0 – 13.0 96.4%
ft 7 14.0 9.0 – 18.0 89.4%
CF
Total 54 27.2 23.5-30.8 99.1%
Boys 23 24.33 19.8-28.9 97.5%
Gils 23 26.0 21.0-30.0 97.8%
The mean dmft\DMFT
Number of studies Mean (95% CI) I2 (%)
DMFT
Total 48 2.33 2.12 – 2.54 99.7%
Boys 29 1.97 1.75 – 2.19 99.7%
Gils 29 1.94 1.71 – 2.16 99.5%
Urban 5 1.89 1.21 – 2.57 99.8%
Rural 5 2.35 1.46 – 3.24 99.8%
DT
Total 22 1.95 1.59 – 2.31 99.7%
Boys 8 1.40 0.91 – 1.88 99.7%
Gils 8 1.48 0.96 – 2.0 95.5%
MT
Total 18 0.20 0.15 – 0.25 99.55%
Boys 8 0.13 0.03 – 0.23 99.7%
Gils 8 0.11 0.03 – 0.18 99.8%
FT
Total 17 0.32 0.26 – 0.38 99.4%
Boys 8 0.23 0.17 – 30.0 97.4%
Gils 8 0.38 0.26 – 0.50 99%
dmft
Total 30 3.86 3.49 – 4.22 99.5%
Boys 19 3.72 3.35 – 4.09 98.7%
Gils 19 3.54 2.86 – 4.23 99.8%
Urban 4 4.25 3.88 – 4.62 89.4%
Rural 4 4.98 4.45 – 5.51 95.24%
dt
Total 11 3.49 2.87 – 4.11 99.3%
Boys 8 2.54 1.79 – 3.30 98.9%
Gils 8 2.50 2.09 – 2.91 99.9%
mt
Total 9 0.50 0.30 – 0.69 98.7%
Boys 8 0.39 0.22 – 0.57 99.6%
Gils 8 0.33 0.17 – 0.49 99.6%
ft
Total 9 0.67 0.50 – 0.84 99.0%
Boys 8 0.36 0.25 – 0.47 96.9%
Gils 8 0.50 0.32 – 0.68 98.5%
SiC
Total 8 6.88 5.34 – 8.52 99.9%
Boys 3 7.65 5.20 – 10.10 99.7%
Gils 3 7.48 4.86 – 10.10 99.8%