Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 11;10(18):9647–9662. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6565

TABLE 4.

AMOVA of the SNP dataset from S. miscanthi

Source of variation Sum of squares Variance components % variation Fixation indices
A Among groups 146,960.625 840.81437 40.68 F CT = 0.4068 (p = 0)
Among populations within groups 23,445.277 83.52677 4.04 F SC = 0.0681 (p = 0)
Among individuals within populations 90,706.443 −22.79868 −1.10 F IS = −0.0199 (p = .6556)
Within individuals 116,543.000 1,165.43000 56.38 F IT = 0.4362 (p = 0)
B Among groups 17,982.662 43.99279 2.22 F CT = 0.0222 (p = .2569)
Among populations within groups 110,074.833 614.04835 31.01 F SC = 0.3172 (p = 0)
Among individuals within populations 133,054.850 156.47861 7.90 F IS = −0.1184 (p = 0)
Within individuals 116,543.000 1,165.43000 58.86 F IT = 0.4114 (p = 0)

Analyses were performed to test the following hierarchical substructure: (A) individuals grouped according to the genetic cluster assignment from Structure; (B) populations grouped according to their north–south location with respect to the Qinling–Huaihe line divide.