TABLE 6.
GC 1 | GC 2 | GC 3 | GC 4 | GC 5 | GC 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genetic cluster 1 | 0.00000 | |||||
Genetic cluster 2 | 0.42822 | 0.00000 | ||||
Genetic cluster 3 | 0.46296 | 0.13319 | 0.00000 | |||
Genetic cluster 4 | 0.43198 | 0.30765 | 0.32792 | 0.00000 | ||
Genetic cluster 5 | 0.65910 | 0.45260 | 0.51381 | 0.54811 | 0.00000 | |
Genetic cluster 6 | 0.55366 | 0.40099 | 0.44521 | 0.38811 | 0.79219 | 0.00000 |
All pairwise comparisons were significant (p = 0) as estimated with 10,100 permutations. GC 1 includes only individuals (n = 9) from Kunming; GC 2 comprises individuals from Kunming (1), Langfang (10), Mianyang (10), Pingliang (2), Qingdao (1), Suzhou (1), and Wuhan (2); GC 3 consists of individuals from Wuhan (6); GC 4 includes individuals collected in Taigu (9) and Yinchuan (8); GC 5 is formed by individuals from Qingdao (9), Suzhou (1), Tai'an (10), and Wuhan (2); and GC 6 includes individuals from Pingliang (8), Suzhou (8), Taigu (1), and Yinchuan (2).