Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 12;10(18):9808–9826. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6620

TABLE A8.

Effects of competition (present/absent) and competitor sex (male/female) on female egg−adult survival

Terms Estimate SE z p
Effect of competition
Not controlling for female weight
Fixed effects
Intercept 1.799 0.069 26.041 <.001
Competition (no) 0.078 0.114 0.687 .492
Random effects Variance SD
Bean ID 0.199 0.446
Controlling for female weight
Fixed effects
Intercept 0.462 0.422 1.095 .273
Competition (no) 0.034 0.116 0.291 .771
Female weight 0.238 0.075 3.199 .001
Random effects Variance SD
Bean ID 0.208 0.455
Effect of competitor sex
Not controlling for female weight
Fixed effects
Intercept 1.626 0.093 17.424 <.001
Competitor sex (male) 0.261 0.120 2.166 .030
Random effects Variance SD
Bean ID 0.129 0.359
Controlling for female weight
Fixed effects
Intercept 0.565 0.459 1.231 .218
Competitor sex (male) 0.189 0.132 1.435 .151
Female weight 0.198 0.084 2.361 .018
Random effects Variance SD
Bean ID 0.153 0.391

We ran each analysis twice – first without including focal female weight (“Not controlling for female weight) and then with focal female weight (“Controlling for female weight”). Results are generalised linear mixed models with a binomial error distribution. p‐values < .05 are shown in bold. Shaded rows show the effects of primary interest.