Table 1.
Advantages | Disadvantages | Contrast Agent | |
---|---|---|---|
MRI | High spatial resolution, Deep tissue penetration, Tomographic capability, No radiation, Repeatability | Low sensitivity, Toxicity of contrast agent, Difficulty of distinguishing between live and dead islets, Pre-labeling islets before transplantation | SPIO, Gd, Mn2+, Zn2+,19F |
SPECT | High resolution, Deep tissue penetration, High sensitivity, Functional evaluation of islets | Low spatial and anatomical resolution, Ionizing radiation | 99mTc, 111In, 123I, 131I |
PET | High resolution, Deep tissue penetration, Higher sensitivity, Functional evaluation of islets | Low spatial and anatomical resolution, Ionizing radiation | 11C, 18F, 68Ga, 64Cu |
FI | High sensitivity, Quantitative evaluation of islets, No radiation | Short period of cancellation, Poor tissue penetration, Low spatial resolution | GFP, RFP, FITC, Cy-5.5 |
BLI | Long-term observation, High sensitivity, Quantitative evaluation of islets, No radiation | Susceptible to internal environment, Weak signal, Low spatial resolution | Luciferin |
US | Simple operation, No radiation, Repeatability, No adverse effects | Operator dependency, Low sensitivity, Weak signal, cannot visualize single islets | |
MPI | No radiation, high temporal resolution, high spatial resolution and high sensitivity | No anatomical background. | Magnetic particle |
PAI | High resolution, Deep tissue penetration, No ionizing radiation Diverse endogenous and exogenous contrast, | Reproducibility and standardization of the images | |
Multimodality imaging |
Combining the advantages of various imaging modalities | High costs, Complexity design of Contrast agent, The long-term effects on the human body need further study | Nanoparticles |