Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 26;8(18):4010–4016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4010

Table 2.

Comparison of levels of bone mineral density and bone metabolic markers between the two groups

Groups n BMD, g/cm2
N-MID, ng/mL β-CTx, pg/mL 25(OH)D, ng/mL
Lumbar L1-4 Hip
Control group
Before the treatment 60 0.71 ± 0.13 0.62 ± 0.09 19.35 ± 8.14 498.57 ± 210.02 9.54 ± 3.67
After the treatment 60 0.88 ± 0.17a 0.76 ± 0.15a 15.54 ± 5.23 376.27 ± 157.45 17.97 ± 5.74
Experimental group
Before the treatment 60 0.73 ± 0.11 0.64 ± 0.08 20.41 ± 8.13 504.74 ± 237.41 9.23 ± 2.84
After the treatment 60 1.04 ± 0.25ab 0.93 ± 0.20ab 10.68 ± 4.24ab 310.64 ± 146.83ab 25.96 ± 6.91ab
a

P < 0.05 vs before the treatment;

b

P < 0.05 vs the control group after the treatment. 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; β-CTx: β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptides; BMD: Bone mineral density; N-MID: N-terminal midfragment.