Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Soc Rev. 2020 Sep 1;49(17):6402–6442. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00705f

Figure 10:

Figure 10:

Overview of microfluidic device designs to mimic the gut. On the left of each panel, a schematic of the model is shown; and on the right, annotated representative microscopy images of the resulting model. (A) 2D monolayers on micro-molded scaffolds106. (B) Microfluidic lumen interface device with integrated peristalsis. White arrows mark fluid flow while dark arrows indicate the motion of the stretchable surface112. (C) Epithelial lumen interface on top of a microporous membrane cocultured with a square cross-sectioned endothelial lumen on the bottom. (D) Silk scaffolding tubular model with fibroblasts (blue), proliferative epithelial cells (green), and epithelial cells (red) 120, 122. (E) Microfluidic ex-vivo gut co-culture with immune and brain cells from rats. Intact intestinal tissue is connected to input and output ports of the chamber (top), pumps controlling medium flow inside the lumen and in the external medium chamber118. (F) Channel network from the Organoplate platform containing cultured gut epithelial tube, ECM gel, and perfusion111. (G) Gut tumor-on-a-chip gradient platform.127 Reproduced with permission from Elsevier, from ref. 106 copyright 2018; from ref 120 copyright 2019; from ref 118, copyright 2017. Ref. 111 adapted with permission of Springer Nature, copyright 2017.