Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;325:128970. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128970

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PAGE characterizations of the CHA, HCR and cascade signal amplification strategy of LCHA and HCR. (a) Electrophoretic pattern of the CHA characterization (10 % PAGE). Lane 1: DNEV; lane 2: C1; lane 3: C2; lane 4: C1 + DENV; lane 5: C2 + DENV; lane 6: C1 + C2; lane 7: C1 + C2 + DENV; lane 8: C1 + C2 + DENV (0.5 times); lane 9: C1 + C2 + DENV (0.1 times). (b) Electrophoretic pattern of the HCR characterization (10 % PAGE). Lane 1: T-C2; lane 2: H1; lane 3: H2; lane 4: H1 + T-C2; lane 5: H2 + T-C2; lane 6: H1 + H2; lane 7: H1 + H2 + T-C2; lane 8: H1 + H2 + T-C2 (0.5 times); lane 9: H1 + H2 + T-C2 (0.1 times). (c) Electrophoretic pattern of the cascade signal amplification strategy of LCHA and HCR (8 % PAGE). Marker (20-500 bp); lane 1: L1; lane 2: L2; lane 3: L1 + L2; lane 4: L1 + L2+C1; lane 5: L1 + L2+C1+C2; lane 6: L1 + L2+C1+C2+DENV; lane 7: L1 + L2+C1+C2+H1+H2+DENV; lane 8: L1 + L2+C1+C2+H1+H2; lane 9: DENV.