Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2020 Feb 18;137:105531. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105531

Table 2:

Mean difference (95% CI) in offspring glucose for IQR increase in total ΣAs, and geometric mean ratio (95% CI) of offspring HOMA-IR by ΣAs.

Glucose (n = 466) HOMA2-IR (n = 387)
Maternal ΣAs Offspring ΣAs Maternal ΣAs Offspring ΣAs
Model 1 7.83 (0.01, 15.65) 5.40 (−1.75, 12.55) 1.04 (0.92, 1.17) 0.93 (0.84, 1.03)
Model 2 6.79 (−0.70, 14.28) 4.73 (−2.30, 11.75) 1.00 (0.90, 1.11) 0.90 (0.81, 1.00)
Model 3 4.40 (−3.46, 12.26) 2.72 (−4.91, 10.34) 1.04 (0.93, 1.16) 0.89 (0.80, 0.99)
Model 4 2.12 (−4.36, 8.59) 4.88 (−2.07, 11.84) 1.02 (0.93, 1.13) 0.96 (0.87, 1.07)
Model 5 1.68 (−4.82, 8.18) 4.25 (−2.68, 11.18) 1.01 (0.93, 1.11) 0.95 (0.86, 1.04)

Model 1 is adjusted for offspring sex and age at baseline visit, and maternal eGFR at baseline for maternal models or offspring eGFR for offspring models

Model 2 = Model 1 + maternal BMI (kg/m2) and maternal fasting glucose (mg/dL) at baseline

Model 3 = Model 2 + offspring ΣAs in maternal models or maternal ΣAs in offspring models (fully adjusted model)

Model 4 = Model 3 + offspring BMI at baseline

Model 5 = Model 3 + offspring waist circumference at baseline

Geometric mean ratios (95% CI) are reported per an increase equal to the IQR in ΣAs distribution.

Generalized estimation equations (GEE) used to account for family clustering.