Table 6.

Results comparison on Physionet database.

Work	Number of electrodes	Number of MI tasks	Database	Global averaged accuracy (%)	Methods
Kim et al. (2016)	14	4	Physionet	77.70	SUTCCSP
Pinheiro et al. (2018)	2	4	Physionet	74.96	RNA
Dose et al. (2018)	64	4	Physionet	80.38	CNN
Karácsony et al. (2019)	64	4	Physionet	76.37	CNN
Hou et al. (2019)	–	4	Physionet	95.54	ESI+CNN
This work	2	4	Physionet	97.28	CNN