Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 25;7:2382120520936604. doi: 10.1177/2382120520936604

Table 1.

Peer feedback assessment rubric.

Exceeds expectations
3 points
Meets expectations
2 points
Below expectations
1 point
• Critical assessment of peer’s concept map using 4 categories listed on rubric (content; connection; links; and organization).
• In addition, group provides specific comments on improvement that can be integrated in following sessions.
Peer review matches or exceeds faculty assessment.
• Critical assessment of peer’s concept map using 4 categories listed on rubric (content; connection; links; and organization).
• Written critiques but not specific enough for improvement.
Peer review close to matching faculty assessment but still needs some improvement.
• No critical assessment of peer’s concept map.
• No critiques for improvement.
Peer review does not come close to matching faculty assessment.