Table 1.
Exceeds expectations 3 points |
Meets expectations 2 points |
Below expectations 1 point |
---|---|---|
• Critical assessment of peer’s concept map using 4 categories listed on rubric (content; connection; links; and organization). • In addition, group provides specific comments on improvement that can be integrated in following sessions. Peer review matches or exceeds faculty assessment. |
• Critical assessment of peer’s concept map using 4 categories listed on rubric (content; connection; links; and organization). • Written critiques but not specific enough for improvement. Peer review close to matching faculty assessment but still needs some improvement. |
• No critical assessment of peer’s concept map. • No critiques for improvement. Peer review does not come close to matching faculty assessment. |