Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;10:555514. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.555514

TABLE 2.

Binary classification results on test set*.

Performance 1CTR (RF) 2PETR (RF) 3CPR (SMO)
(a) Adc vs. NAdc
Accuracy 81.6 85.0 100.0
True positive rate 0.81 0.89 1.00
True negative rate 0.82 0.80 1.00
Mean of precision 0.88 0.85 1.00
AUC 0.90 0.95 1.00

Performance CTR PETR CPR

(b) Sqc vs. NSqc
Accuracy 76.3 83.4 98.5
True positive rate 0.94 0.90 0.97
True negative rate 0.57 0.77 1.00
Mean of precision 0.80 0.84 0.99
AUC 0.89 0.94 0.99
(c) Primary vs. Mts
Accuracy 86.6 80.9 98.0
True positive rate 0.96 0.92 0.96
True negative rate 0.75 0.69 1.00
Mean of precision 0.88 0.82 0.98
AUC 0.98 0.94 0.98

*Adc, Adenocarcinoma, Sqc, squamous cell carcinoma, Mts, metastases, NAdc, not adenocarcinoma, NSqc, not squamous cell carcinoma. 1CT-based radiomics (with Random Forest classification). 2PET-based radiomics (with Random Forest classification). 3The combination of CT- and PET-based radiomics (with Sequential minimal optimization classification). The best performance metrics for each classification are highlighted in bold.