Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct 31;222(5):484.e1–484.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.010

TABLE 2.

Patient demographics for the PS-IPTW model (n = 3215)

RT alone
CCRT
Characteristic n = 1220 n = 1995 P value SD (before) SD (after)
Age, y .826 0.1811 0.0374
 <30 69 (5.7%) 130 (6.5%)
 30–39 355 (29.1%) 586 (29.4%)
 40–49 368 (30.2%) 607 (30.4%)
 50–59 234 (19.2%) 364 (18.3%)
 60–69 130 (10.7%) 217 (10.9%)
 ≥70 64 (5.2%) 90 (4.5%)
Year .729 1.1292 0.0252
 1988–1997 226 (18.5%) 348 (17.4%)
 1998–2007 549 (45.0%) 905 (45.4%)
 2008–2016 445 (36.5%) 742 (37.2%)
Race/ethnicity .942 0.0270 0.0245
 White 702 (57.5%) 1130 (56.6%)
 Black 104 (8.5%) 165 (8.3%)
 Hispanic 288 (23.6%) 488 (24.4%)
 Asian 107 (8.8%) 175 (8.8%)
 Others 19 (1.6%) 38 (1.9%)
Registry area .886 0.0115 0.0012
 West 782 (64.0%) 1285 (64.4%)
 Central 184 (15.1%) 288 (14.4%)
 East 255 (20.9%) 422 (21.2%)
Marital status .970 0.0940 0.0190
 Married 627 (51.4%) 1041 (52.2%)
 Single 295 (24.2%) 480 (24.1%)
 Others 264 (21.6%) 421 (21.1%0
 Unknown 34 (2.8%) 52 (2.6%)
Histology .934 0.1253 0.0049
 Squamous 809 (66.3%) 1324 (66.4%)
 Adenocarcinoma 297 (24.3%) 477 (23.9%)
 Adenosquamous 114 (9.3%) 194 (9.7%)
Tumor differentiation .751 0.1164 0.0326
 Well 60 (4.9%) 94 (4.7%0
 Moderate 495 (40.6%) 775 (38.8%)
 Poor 582 (47.7%) 988 (49.5%)
 Unknown 83 (6.8%) 138 (6.9%)
T stage .979 0.0358 0.0253
 1a 39 (3.2%) 68 (3.4%)
 1b 747 (61.2%) 1193 (59.8%)
 1NOS 76 (6.2%) 123 (6.2%)
 2a 125 (10.2%) 215 (10.8%)
 2b 233 (19.1%) 396 (19.8%)
 2NOS 0 1
Tumor size, cm .857 0.2341 0.0284
 <2.0 157 (12.9%) 238 (11.9%)
 2.0–3.9 446 (36.6%) 717 (35.9%)
 4.0–5.9 307 (25.2%) 513 (25.7%)
 ≥6.0 106 (8.7%) 192 (9.6%)
 Unknown 204 (16.7%) 335 (16.8%)
Lymph node ratio .433 0.0907 0.0246
 ≤7.6% 453 (37.1%) 749 (37.5%)
 >7.6% 705 (57.8%) 1165 (58.4%)
 Unknown 62 (5.1%) 82 (4.1%)
Hysterectomy type .829 0.0760 0.0229
 Simplea 312 (25.6%) 493 (24.7%)
 Radical 828 (67.9%) 1364 (68.4%)
 NOS 80 (6.6%) 138 (6.9%)
Lymphadenectomy .294 0.0825 0.0557
 Not adequate 1028 (84.3%) 1718 (86.1%)
 Adequate 131 (10.7%) 195 (9.8%)
 Unknown count 61 (5.0%) 82 (4.1%)

SD ≤0.10 indicates a good-balance between the groups. A binary logistic regression test was used for the P value in the PS-IPTW model.

CCRT, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; NOS, not otherwise specified; PS-IPTW, propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting; RT, radiotherapy; SD, standardized difference.

a

Including pan-hysterectomy.