Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Apr 25;295(6):1459–1468. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4375-z

Table 2.

Significance of EC-AIA expanding into the endometrium

Endometrium extension
p value
No Yes
No. n = 28 n = 16
Age 59.3 ± 10.2 58.2 ± 10.0 0.91
 <50 4 (14.8%) 3 (18.8%)
 50–59 10 (37.0%) 5 (31.2%)
 ≥60 13 (48.2%) 8 (50.0%)
Symptom 0.24
 Abnormal uterine bleeding 9 (32.1%) 9 (56.3%)
 Abdominal-pelvic pain 8 (28.6%) 5 (31.3%)
 Other symptoms 3 (10.7%) 1 (6.2%)
 Asymptomatic 8 (28.6%) 1 (6.2%)
Grade 0.99
 low-grade 18 (69.2%) 9 (64.3%)
 high-grade 8 (30.8%) 5 (35.7%)
Histology 0.40
 Endometrioid 21 (75.0%) 12 (80.0%)
 Serous 4 (14.3%) 3 (20.0%)
 Clear cell 3 (10.7%) 0
Stage 0.16
 I 20 (80.0%) 8 (57.2%)
 II 0 1 (7.1%)
 III 2 (8.0%) 4 (28.6%)
 IV 3 (12.0%) 1 (7.1%)

Student t test, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test for p value

Mean (±SD) or number (%) is shown

1 missing data for age and histology, 4 missing data for grade, and 5 missing data for stage

EC-AIA and endometrial cancer arising in adenomyosis