Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;24:586. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03301-x

Table 2.

Comparisons of related parameter between ZEEP and high PEEP in 30 patients

Variables ZEEP High PEEP P value
SpO2 (%) 95 (91–98) 98 (96–99) 0.008*
HR (bpm) 94 ± 17 94 ± 17 0.783
MAP (mmHg) 87 ± 9 84 ± 10 0.022*
EELI (AU) 1400 (996–1800) 7883 ± 3739 < 0.0001*
GI 0.411 (0.370–0.503) 0.386 (0.350–0.432) 0.131
VQMatch% 61 (47–70) 71 ± 10 < 0.0001*
DeadSpace% 18 ± 10 13 ± 10 0.013*
Shunt% 22 ± 14 16 ± + 11 0.008*
R pixels total Baseline 142 ± 74 N/A
 Ventral Baseline 32 (13–95) N/A
 Dorsal Baseline 82 (53–128) N/A
O pixels total Baseline 48 (0–121) N/A
 Ventral Baseline 48 (0–115) N/A
 Dorsal Baseline 0 (0–0.25) N/A
O/R pixels ratio Baseline 0.45 (0–1.1) N/A

SpO2 peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, HR heart rate, MAP mean arterial pressure, EELI end-expiratory lung impedance, GI the global inhomogeneity index, R recruitment, O overdistension, N/A not applicable

*Significantly different between ZEEP vs. high PEEP

P < 0.05 compared to dorsal