Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Mater. 2019 Sep 11;31(19):7845–7854. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01750

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Phantom imaging of different agents with DEM and CT. (A) CT phantom image at 80 kV and (B) CT attenuation rates for each tube voltage. (C) DEM phantom images and (D) signal difference-to-noise ratios calculated from DE subtraction images in (C). Error bars are one standard deviation in all cases. * indicates P < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA for panels B and D, respectively, with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests).