Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2018 Mar 9;32(6):693–719. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1447641

Table 1.

Demographic and pre-treatment linguistic profile of participants.

Treatment Group ID Gender Ethnicity Age Number lesioned voxels MPOa AACb exper. Level of education Aphasia typec Aphasia severityc RCBA-2d
AAC 1 Female Caucasian 57 18727 79 None Some coll.e Global 40.8 72
2 Male Caucasian 61 30570 91 LTg Bachelor’s Broca’sf 68.6 69
3f Female Caucasian 47 14616 124 LT, HTh Bachelor’s Broca’sf 48.9 72
4 Female Caucasian 63 17705 170 LT, HT Bachelor’s Conduction 71.2 95
5i Female Caucasian 57 7849 16 None High school Wernicke’s 37.6 81
6 Female Caucasian 39 18807 44 None Some coll. Anomic 82.4 86
Usual Care 7 Female African amer. 58 1583 48 None Bachelor’s Anomic 89.2 74
8 Female Caucasian 60 12950 105 None Some coll. Conduction 74.0 86
9 Male Caucasian 59 14009 73 LT Master’s Anomic 68.9 71
10 Male Caucasian 47 10989 69 None High school Wernicke’s 55.5 63
11 Male Caucasian 71 14066 69 LT Master’s Broca’sf 62.7 93
12 Male Caucasian 66 30110 38 LT, HT Bachelor’s Broca’sf 36.7 67

Note.

a

Months post-onset

b

Augmentative and Alternative Communication Experience

c

Western Aphasia Battery-Revised used to determine type and severity, Aphasia Quotient out of 100

d

Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia-2nd Edition, total points available = 100

e

Some College

f

Apraxia of Speech present based on clinical judgment

g

Low-Tech

h

High-tech

i

Left-handed (pre-stroke).