Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;7(5):3013–3021. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12925

TABLE 1.

Regional differences in practices of genetic counselling and testing

East Europe (n = 713) North Europe (n = 543) South Europe (n = 1,427) West Europe (n = 481) North Africa (n = 44) All (n = 3208) P‐value
Genetic counselling performed, n (%) 393/670 (58.7) 294/519 (56.7) 907/1338 (67.8) 157/370 (42.4) 35/42 (83.3) 1786/2939 (60.8) <0.001
Geneticist, n (%) 9/393 (2.3) 28/294 (9.5) 168/907 (18.5) 64/157 (40.8) 0/35 (0.0) 269/1786 (15.1) <0.001
Genetic counsellor, n (%) 5/393 (1.3) 24/294 (8.2) 99/907 (10.9) 74/157 (47.1) 0/35 (0.0) 202/1786 (11.3) <0.001
Cardiologist, n (%) 386/393 (98.2) 233/294 (79.3) 838/907 (92.4) 31/157 (19.8) 35/35 (100.0) 1523/1786 (85.3) <0.001
Nurse, n (%) 0/393 (0.0) 47/294 (16.0) 87/907 (9.6) 0/157 (0.0) 0/35 (0.0) 134/1786 (7.5) <0.001
Genetic testing performed, n (%) 102/672 (15.2) 181/523 (34.6) 659/1326 (49.7) 163/404 (40.4) 0/38 (0.0) 1105/2963 (37.3) <0.001

One patient could receive genetic counselling from several professionals.

Geographical areas were defined according to United Nations geoscheme for Europe (https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/).

The table includes data on index patients, relatives, and those with unknown family position.