Table 2.
Number of patients | Result | |
---|---|---|
LVEDVi (Scan 1), ml/m2 | 97 | 87.44 (14.80) |
LVEDVi (Scan 2), mL/m2 | 73 | 90.77 (14.95) |
LVEDVi (Scan 3), mL/m2 | 86 | 86.36 (17.55) |
Δ LVEDVi (Scan 2 minus Scan 1), mL/m2 | 63 | 1.68 (8.37) |
Δ LVEDVi (Scan 3 minus Scan 1), mL/m2 | 75 | 0.45 (12.43) |
Δ LVEDVi (Scan 3 minus Scan 2), mL/m2 | 56 | −3.11 (11.94) |
LVEF (Scan 1), % | 97 | 48.12 (9.81) |
LVEF (Scan 2), % | 73 | 49.86 (9.66) |
LVEF (Scan 3), % | 86 | 53.56 (9.55) |
Δ LVEF (Scan 2 minus Scan 1), % | 63 | 1.45 (5.96) |
Δ LVEF (Scan 3 minus Scan 1), % | 75 | 2.79 (6.65) |
Δ LVEF (Scan 3 minus Scan 2), % | 56 | 0.29 (7.06) |
Infarct size (Scan 1), % | 85 | 0.20 (0.13) |
Infarct size (Scan 2), % | 66 | 0.17 (0.10) |
Infarct size (Scan 3), % | 75 | 0.10 (0.08) |
Infarct expansion (Scan 2 minus Scan 1), % | 54 | −0.015 (0.045) |
Data are mean (SD). Delta (Δ) values were calculated as the differences of respective cMRI scans, as indicated.
cMRI, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; LVEDVi, end‐diastolic volume of the left ventricle indexed to body surface area; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.