FIGURE 4.
Histograms and cumulative density functions (CDFs) were used to compare distributions of D‐spacing based on region and grade of degeneration. The average values were not different from one another (61.1 ± 2.9, 62.6 ± 2.3, and 63.3 ± 1.9 nm for AF nondegenerate, AF degenerate, and NP degenerate, respectively). Distributions were compared using CDFs and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test statistics. The AF nondegenerate distribution was different from both of the degenerate distributions with statistical significance (P < .05). The AF and NP degenerate distributions were not different from one another (P > .05). AF, annulus fibrosis; NP, nucleus pulposus