Table 2.
Comparison of the Most Abundant Genera between the Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group and the No Enterobactericaeae Bacteriuria Group. For each of the top 10 genera, the relative abundance of 153 fecal specimens from 51 patients in the Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group was compared to the relative abundance of 357 fecal specimens from the 117 patients in the No Enterobacteriaceae Bacteriuria Group using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. The adjusted P values were calculated using a Bonferonni correction. In bold are the genera that were significantly different between the groups (Adjusted P < .01).
| No Enterobacteriaceae | Enterobacteriaceae | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteriuria Group | Bacteriuria Group | |||
| (357 specimens, | (153 specimens, | |||
| 117 subjects) | 51 subjects) | |||
| Median Gut Relative | Median Gut Relative | |||
| Genus | Abundance (%) | Abundance (%) | P value | Adjusted P value |
| Lactobacillus | 0.04% | 0.21% | 1.0 x 10–7 | 1.0 x 10−6 |
| Faecalibacterium | 0.80% | 0.03% | 1.4 x 10–7 | 1.4 x 10−6 |
| Romboutsia | 0.39% | 0.06% | 3.4 x 10–4 | 0.003 |
| Blautia | 17.07% | 13.25% | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Ruminococcus | 2.45% | 1.59% | 0.011 | 0.108 |
| Streptococcus | 0.64% | 1.28% | 0.016 | 0.162 |
| Ruminiclostridium | 1.45% | 0.97% | 0.038 | 0.376 |
| Gemmiger | 1.84% | 0.33% | 0.062 | 0.621 |
| Bifidobacterium | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.538 | 0.999 |
| Erysipelatoclostridium | 5.45% | 4.68% | 0.699 | 0.999 |