Skip to main content
. 2020 May;32(2):437–454. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000191

Table 6.

Risk behavior, criminal behavior, victimization, and mental health outcomes for the entire sample, consistent low-risk “two-parent/economic advantage” families and movement away from consistent low-risk “two-parent/economic advantage” families (n = families with data at age 14)

Overall Consistent low-risk “two-parent/econ. adv.” (n = 6,084) Low-risk → “two-parent/high-conflict” at age 3 (n = 330) Low-risk → “single-parent/econ. hardship” by age 3 (n = 438) Low-risk → “two-parent/high-conflict” at age 5 (n = 326) Low-risk → “single-parent/econ. hardship” by age 5 (n = 261)
Risk behavior outcomes % % % RRR/Coef. & CI % RRR/Coef. & CI % RRR/Coef. & CI % RRR/Coef. & CI
Early sexualization
Oral sex/intercourse 3.4% 2.6% 3.3% ns 3.8% ns 6.0% ns 2.2% ns
Substance use
Ever binge drinking 10.8% 8.6% 10.7% ns 15.4% 1.95 [1.37, 2.76]*** 14.8% 1.84 [1.10, 3.11]+ 12.0% ns
Cannabis/illegal drug use 5.7% 3.5% 5.7% ns 7.8% 2.32 [1.47, 3.65]*** 7.2% ns 2.9% ns
Antisocial and criminal behavior outcomes
Antisocial behavior
Cohort member (CM) vandalized/damaged property 5.4% 3.6% 6.5% 1.83 [1.12, 2.99]+ 6.6% 1.88 [1.15, 3.07]+ 9.7% 2.85 [1.48, 5.46]** 5.0% ns
CM shoplifted 3.7% 3.0% 3.1% ns 5.6%+ 1.88 [1.10, 3.22]+ 4.0% ns 2.2% ns
Hacking 4.7% 4.1% 4.5% ns 6.0% ns 7.5% 1.88 [1.13, 3.14]+ 4.0% ns
Criminal activity
CM had carried weapon 2.7% 1.7% 6.6% 3.99 [2.00, 7.97]*** 4.3% 2.50 [1.27, 4.90]** 1.9% ns 0.7% ns
CM has hit/assaulted or used weapon against someone 31.9% 28.2% 32.9% ns 37.9% 1.49 [1.14, 1.96]** 32.3% ns 29.0% ns
CM has stolen property 1.2% 1.0% 1.7% ns 1.1% ns 1.0% ns 1.7% ns
CM is or was in gang 3.9% 2.1% 7.7% 3.86 [2.13, 7.02]*** 5.5% 2.73 [1.55, 4.79]** 6.5% 3.15 [1.26, 7.87]+ 5.4% 2.58 [1.03, 6.44]+
Contact with police
CM questioned by police 16.6% 11.1% 24.3% 2.57 [1.80, 3.65]*** 20.9% 2.08 [1.47, 2.93]*** 18.1% 1.78 [1.16, 2.76]** 16.3% 1.66 [1.04, 2.64]+
CM given warning by police 9.3% 5.4% 15.0% 3.06 [1.93, 4.86]*** 15.0% 3.02 [2.04, 4.49]*** 6.7% ns 11.1% 2.29 [1.39, 3.78]**
CM arrested by police 1.4% 0.6% 3.5% 5.82 [1.59, 21.36]** 1.8% ns 1.6% ns 0.7% ns
Criminal victimization outcomes
CM was violently assaulted/had weapon used on 23.8% 21.8% 28.3% 1.41 [1.06, 1.87]+ 27.2% ns 21.2% ns 19.9% ns
CM had something stolen 7.8% 6.6% 8.5% ns 11.7% 1.87 [1.23, 2.84]** 6.4% ns 6.5% ns
CM was sexually assaulted 2.8% 2.5% 3.4% ns 2.3% ns 2.2% ns 0.8% .29 [.10, 86]+
Mental health outcomes
Past-year self-harm 15.4% 13.0% 16.8% ns 19.9% 1.81 [1.28, 2.55]** 16.3% ns 15.4% ns
MFQ depression symptoms 5.71 (.08) 5.22 (.10) 6.46 (.46) .04 [.02, .06]** 6.82 (.37) .05 [.03, .07]*** 5.53 (.38) ns 6.19 (.51) ns
Rosenberg self-esteem 10.49 (.05) 10.71 (.06) 10.24 (.16) –.07 [–.11, –.03]** 10.05 (.18) –.10 [–.15, –.05]*** 10.49 (.22) ns 10.05 (.19) –.07 [–.12, –.02]**

+p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.