Objective 1: Contexts |
-
•
Country: US, UK, Australia
-
•
Sample: Undergraduate students
-
•
Discipline: Biological Sciences, Business/Economics/Management
|
-
•
Research on under-investigated countries, samples and disciplines
-
•
Comparison of data from multiple institutions
-
•
Cross-country and cross-cultural study
-
•
Jointly understanding the views of students and instructors
|
Objective 2: Methods |
|
|
Objective 3: Overarching Steams in the Literature |
-
•
Positive association with learning but negative association with attendance
-
•
Benefits of lecture capture seem to outnumber its drawbacks
-
•
The assumption among most students is that lecture capture is helpful for learning, and among staff is that it takes a toll on attendance
-
•
Lecture capture seems to work well if students use it as a supplementary resource—rather than an alternative—to live lectures
|
-
•
Close and differentiated replication
-
•
Comparing students watching on laptops versus mobile devices
-
•
Comparing usage between lower-achieving and higher-achieving students
-
•
Comparing usage between frequent attendees and non-frequent attendees in face-to-face lectures
-
•
Research on instructors' personality, lecturing style, and teaching performance with and without lecture capture
-
•
Comparing junior and senior academics as instructors when using lecture capture
-
•
Reconciliation of students' perception of lecture capture, instructors' perception of lecture capture, and the reality of lecture capture
|