Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;10(9):e042867. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042867

Table 1.

Summary of key findings

Variables, N All
200
2018
78
2019
75
2020
47
P value
Age in months Median (IQR) 69 (85) 72.5 (76) 70 (109) 55 (77) 0.598
Gender Female (%) 73 (36.5) 32 (41.0) 31 (41.3) 10 (21.3) 0.046
School status (%)
 Preschool 85 (42.5) 34 (43.6) 30 (40.0) 21 (44.7) 0.637
 Primary (reception—year 2006) 78 (39.0) 32 (41.0) 26 (34.7) 20 (42.6)
 Secondary (year 2007–2011) 32 (16.0) 11 (14.1) 16 (21.3) 5 (10.6)
 College/sixth form (year 2012–2013) 5 (2.5) 1 (1.3) 3 (4.0) 1 (2.1)
Is child an index case (vs sibling or household contact)? Yes (%) 134 (67) 46 (59.0) 56 (74.7) 32 (68.1) 0.117
Source of referral (who did child disclose abuse to, or who initiated CPME referral) (%)
 School or yearly years staff 86 (43.9) 36 (47.4) 38 (52.1) 12 (25.5) 0.015
 Social care staff 22 (11.2) 10 (13.2) 3 (4.1) 9 (19.1)
 Police 22 (11.2) 11 (14.5) 7 (9.6) 4 (8.5)
 Family member 36 (18.4) 9 (11.8) 17 (23.3) 10 (21.3)
 Medical professional 4 (2.0) 2 (2.6) 2 (2.7) 0 (0.0)
 Foster carer 7 (3.6) 1 (1.3) 2 (2.7) 4 (8.5)
 Sibling current inpatient due to NAI 12 (6.1) 6 (7.9) 1 (1.4) 5 (10.6)
 Other 7 (3.6) 1 (1.3) 3 (4.1) 3 (6.4)
 Was child known to social care prior to CPME referral? Yes (%) 151 (75.9) 58 (74.4) 56 (75.7) 37 (78.7) 0.857
 Is child an open case to social care now? Yes (%) 106 (53.3) 39 (50.0) 38 (51.4) 29 (61.7) 0.409
 Are there physical findings to support NAI or neglect? Yes (%) 98 (51.0) 32 (41.0) 46 (59.0) 27 (57.4) 0.071
 Does the report indicate significant safeguarding concerns? Yes % 180 (93.8) 69 (88.5) 64 (95.5) 47 (100) 0.014

CPME, child protection medical examination; NAI, non-accidental injury.