Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;13:496. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04371-0

Table 2.

Comparison of G. truncatula LAMP and PCR assays using environmental water samples

Date collected Habitat LAMP (n/N) PCR (n/N)
Farm A
 03/05/2019 1 2/2 0/2
 03/05/2019 2 0/2 0/2
 09/05/2019 1 1/2 1/2
 09/05/2019 2 1/2 1/2
 16/05/2019 1 1/2 1/2
 16/05/2019 2 2/2 2/2
 30/05/2019 1 2/2 2/2
 30/05/2019 2 2/2 2/2
 06/06/2019 1 2/2 2/2
 06/06/2019 2 1/2 1/2
 13/06/2019 1 2/2 2/2
 13/06/2019 2 1/2 2/2
Farm B
 03/05/2019 3 1/2 0/2
 03/05/2019 4 0/2 0/2
 09/05/2019 3 0/2 1/2
 09/05/2019 4 0/2 1/2
 16/05/2019 3 1/2 2/2
 16/05/2019 4 1/2 1/2
 30/05/2019 3 1/2 1/2
 30/05/2019 4 2/2 1/2
 06/06/2019 3 1/2 0/2
 06/06/2019 4 0/2 1/2
 13/06/2019 3 2/2 2/2
 13/06/2019 4 1/2 1/2

Notes: eDNA samples were collected in four locations at Farm A and Farm B over a 7-week period. Area characteristics of the habitats were: 1, stream; 2, water pools; 3, stream; 4, ditch (as shown in Fig. 1)

Abbreviation: n/N, positive/examined