Table 2.

Mann Whitney analyses of DMASC-MC differences across groups

Group and Z adjusted, p-value	DMASC social cognition		DMASC perceptive		DMASC cognitive
Non-PDA versus PDA	3.37	p < 0.0008a	3.19	p < 0.0015a	2.48	p < 0.0133
PDA versus controls (Uncorrected)	−7.55	p < 0.0001a	−6.09	p < 0.0001a	−6.80	p < 0.0001a
PDA versus controls (Corrected)	−7.88	p < 0.0001a	−6.42	p < 0.0001a	−7.05	p < 0.0001a
Non-PDA versus controls (Uncorrected)	−3.24	p < 0.0012a	−1.91	p = 0.0555	−3.15	p = 0.0016a
Non-PDA versus Controls (Corrected)	−3.49	p < 0.0005a	−2.15	p < 0.0312	−3.37	p < 0.0008a

Kruskal Wallis for all three groups Social cognition H (2, n = 159) = 64.25, p < 0.0001, Perceptive H (2, n = 159) = 41.68, p < 0.0001, cognitive H (2, n = 159) = 51.08, p < 0.0001. Corrected values obtained after excluding 2 extreme values in the community control group ^asignificant after Bonferroni correction for 15 comparisons