Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;8(1):e001262. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001262

Table 3.

A validation of our definition of type 1 diabetes: descriptive statistics

Sex Age group TP TN FN FP Sensitivity (%) 95% CI Specificity (%) 95% CI PPV (%) 95% CI NPV (%) 95% CI Kappa Youden
Both All 7103 1 496 465 2776 3297 0.72 0.71 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.67 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.72
Male All 3157 852 905 1521 1588 0.67 0.66 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.65 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67
Female All 3946 643 560 1255 1709 0.76 0.75 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.69 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.76
Male 0–19 793 1633 41 46 0.95 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.98 0.95 0.93 0.96 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.92 0.92
Female 0–19 997 1352 41 59 0.96 0.95 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.97 0.94 0.93 0.96 0.97 0.96 0.98 0.92 0.92
Male 20–39 773 31 073 150 300 0.84 0.81 0.86 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.72 0.69 0.75 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.77 0.83
Female 20–39 850 33 441 203 326 0.81 0.78 0.83 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.72 0.70 0.75 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.75 0.80
Male 40–59 945 250 927 546 623 0.63 0.61 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.58 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.62 0.63
Female 40–59 1124 129 013 328 562 0.77 0.75 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.64 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.77
Male 60– 646 569 272 784 619 0.45 0.43 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.48 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.45
Female 60– 975 479 754 683 762 0.59 0.56 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.54 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.59

FN, false negative; FP, false positive; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.