Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;5(17):e126525. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126525

Figure 3. Direct functional effects of PYRapelin13 on atrial electrophysiology.

Figure 3

(A) Representative murine atrial activation isochrones (ms) at baseline and following PYRapelin13 administration (20 nM) in isolated (denervated) atria paced at 90 ms intervals from the right atrial appendage (RAA) (scale bar: 200 μm). (B) Conduction velocities calculated from the left atrial appendage (LAA) of 90 ms paced atria were increased (***P < 0.0007, 2-tailed Student’s paired t test comparing before and after PYRapelin13 administration) following PYRapelin13 administration in both exercised and sedentary control mice. (C) Representative tracings and I–V relationships of INa from isolated murine left atrial (LA) myocytes before (baseline) and after PYRapelin13 (10 nM) infusion. (D) Whole-cell voltage-clamp steady-state sodium channel activation curves were determined from single-cell recordings from sedentary CD1 mice (8–10 weeks old) of cardiac sodium current (INa) in freshly isolated murine LA myocytes before and after treatment with PYRapelin13 (10 nM) infusion and saline (control). In contrast to saline infusion, apelin reversibly induced a hyperpolarized voltage shift (P = 0.041) in the steady-state activation curve from –40.68 ± 2.03 mV to –46.58 ± 1.69 mV. (E) I–V relationship of INa from LA myocytes before and after saline revealed no change in maximal conductance. By contrast, PYRapelin13 (10 nM) infusion increased (P = 0.006) maximum conductance from 0.34 ± 0.02 pS/pF to 0.41 ± 0.02 pS/pF. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. For sodium channel measures, n = 7 myocytes/3 mouse isolated atria per group. Representative data are the result of experiments being repeated 6 times.