Supplementary Table 4.
Risk of Bias Assessments Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
| Author, Year | Selection (Max 4) | Comparability (Max 2) | Outcome Assessment (Max 3) | Overall Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive FIT | ||||
| Meester 2016 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A (modeling study) |
| Corley 2017 |
4 | 2 | 3 | High quality |
| Rutter 2018 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A (modeling study) |
| Zorzi 2020 |
3 | 1 | 2 | Moderate quality |
| Kaalby 2019 |
4 | 1 | 2 | Moderate quality |
| Kim 2019 |
3 | 1 | 2 | Moderate quality |
| Lee 2019 |
3 | 1 | 2 | Moderate quality |
| Positive FOBT | ||||
| Gellad 2009 |
3 | 1 | 2 | Moderate quality |
| Flugelman 2019 |
4 | 2 | 2 | High quality |
| Beshara 2020 |
4 | 2 | 2 | High quality |
FIT, fecal immunochemical test; FOBT, fecal occult blood test; N/A, ▪▪▪.