Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;11:566977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566977

TABLE 4.

Effect of tDCS on the conformity tendency in different NPIs.

1 Anodal
2 Sham
3 Cathodal
Stimulation M (SE) M (SE) M (SE) Post-hoc tests
NPI = −3 0.511 (0.054) 0.562 (0.053) 0.711 (0.046) 1 and 2, 1–3* and 2 and 3*
NPI = −1 0.184 (0.041) 0.138 (0.035) 0.223 (0.046) 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
NPI = 3 0.986 (0.008) 1.000 (0.000) 0.996 (0.004) 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3
NPI = 1 0.957 (0.015) 0.973 (0.012) 0.977 (0.009) 1 and 2, 1–3 and 2 and 3

Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between the treatments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.