The present study contributes new knowledge to understand HRSV assembly by providing evidence that nonglycosylated structural proteins M and N interact with elements of the secretory pathway, shedding light on their intracellular traffic. To the best of our knowledge, the present contribution is important given the scarcity of studies about the traffic of HRSV nonglycosylated proteins, especially by pointing to the involvement of SNX2, a retromer component, in the HRSV assembly process.
KEYWORDS: human respiratory syncytial virus, paramyxovirus, protein trafficking, virus-host interactions
ABSTRACT
Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) envelope glycoproteins traffic to assembly sites through the secretory pathway, while nonglycosylated proteins M and N are present in HRSV inclusion bodies but must reach the plasma membrane, where HRSV assembly happens. Little is known about how nonglycosylated HRSV proteins reach assembly sites. Here, we show that HRSV M and N proteins partially colocalize with the Golgi marker giantin, and the glycosylated F and nonglycosylated N proteins are closely located in the trans-Golgi, suggesting their interaction in that compartment. Brefeldin A compromised the trafficking of HRSV F and N proteins and inclusion body sizes, indicating that the Golgi is important for both glycosylated and nonglycosylated HRSV protein traffic. HRSV N and M proteins colocalized and interacted with sorting nexin 2 (SNX2), a retromer component that shapes endosomes in tubular structures. Glycosylated F and nonglycosylated N HRSV proteins are detected in SNX2-laden aggregates with intracellular filaments projecting from their outer surfaces, and VPS26, another retromer component, was also found in inclusion bodies and filament-shaped structures. Similar to SNX2, TGN46 also colocalized with HRSV M and N proteins in filamentous structures at the plasma membrane. Cell fractionation showed enrichment of SNX2 in fractions containing HRSV M and N proteins. Silencing of SNX1 and 2 was associated with reduction in viral proteins, HRSV inclusion body size, syncytium formation, and progeny production. The results indicate that HRSV structural proteins M and N are in the secretory pathway, and SNX2 plays an important role in the traffic of HRSV structural proteins toward assembly sites.
INTRODUCTION
Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) is the most relevant viral cause of respiratory infection in children, with extensive morbidity and nearly 200,000 deaths every year (1). HRSV belongs to the genus Orthopneumovirus of the family Pneumoviridae and has a negative-strand RNA genome that encodes the following 11 proteins: the nonstructural proteins 1 and 2 (NS1 and NS2), nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), small hydrophobic (SH), major glycoprotein (G), fusion (F) glycoprotein, proteins M2-1 and -2, and the polymerase (L) (2). To enter host cells, the HRSV surface glycoproteins bind to several possible cell surface receptors (3–5), triggering fusion of the virus envelope with the cell membrane, mediated by the cleaved viral protein F (6). HRSV glycoproteins are translated in association with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), glycosylated in the Golgi apparatus, and then targeted to virus assembly/budding sites through the secretory pathway (2). In polarized epithelial cells, HRSV assembly takes place at the apical plasma membrane, taking advantage of the apical endosome recycling pathway with the incorporation of caveolin-1 in virus particles (7–9). HRSV F glycoprotein, in particular, traffics to the apical membrane following the secretory pathway, and its cytoplasmic tail is important for this addressing (10). In this context, RAB11-FIP2 protein was shown to be critical for virus egress, since HRSV is not dependent on the Vps-4, an element of the ESCRT machinery, for its replication (11). Remarkably, although viral glycoproteins are important components of the virus structure, they are not essential for targeting the virus assembly/budding processes toward the apical surface of polarized cells (12, 13).
Proteins N and M have multiple functions during HRSV replication. The N protein directly interacts with the viral RNA, participates in the formation of virus-induced inclusion bodies, and has been shown to impair immunological synapses on the cell surface (14), whereas the M protein participates in virus assembly and budding on the cell surface and interacts with different host cell proteins to play several other functions in the virus replication (15–17). It was recently shown by superresolution imaging that the inclusion bodies are compartmentalized viral factories with specific regions where viral mRNA transcription happens involving N, P, L, M2-1, and viral genome (18). In contrast to the HRSV envelope glycoproteins whose traffic through the Golgi apparatus has been well studied, very little is known about how the nonglycosylated M and N structural proteins are conveyed to virus assembly sites, which prompted the present studies.
RESULTS
HRSV F, M, and N proteins colocalize at the Golgi.
Although it is well established that HRSV assembles at the plasma membrane (2), it is possible that the structural proteins F, M, and N reach a common intracellular site. To investigate this possibility, we studied their spatial relationship with markers of the secretory and endocytic pathways in infected cells. The HRSV F glycoprotein is synthesized in the ER, and it is known to traverse the Golgi stacks (19, 20). In fact, at 24 hours postinfection (hpi), the F protein largely colocalized with giantin, a marker of cis and medial Golgi cisternae at the juxtanuclear region (Fig. 1A to H and Q), and it is also present at the cell periphery. N protein labeling was also detected at the cell periphery in filament-shaped structures (arrows in Fig. 1C) and concentrated at large vesicular structures, suggestive of inclusion bodies, which were often seen in close proximity to giantin, and F protein labeling (Fig. 1A to P and Q). In addition to large cytosolic vesicles, M protein labeling was also detected throughout cytoplasm and at the juxtanuclear region, where it partially overlapped with giantin (Fig. 1I to Q and Fig. S1G to J). Therefore, this set of data indicates that there is partial overlap of the HRSV F, M, and N proteins at the cis and medial Golgi.
This notion was confirmed by superresolution imaging showing tight proximity between HRSV F and N proteins in giantin-labeled Golgi compartments (Fig. 2A to D and Video S1). To test if F and N proteins interact with each other, proximity ligation assays (PLA) were performed (Fig. 2E to N). PLA signal for HRSV F and N proteins demonstrated that interaction occurs near the Golgi compartments, as shown by the partial overlap of PLA and TGN46 signals (Fig. 2K to N). It is noteworthy that TGN46 labeling was used instead of giantin to localize the Golgi, because PLA requires antibodies made in different species, in this case rabbit and mouse. Since the antibody for giantin was raised in rabbit, to overcome this limitation we used TGN46 antibody made in sheep. As negative control of PLA, cells were transfected with Vps4-GFP, and at 4 hours posttransfection, the cells were infected with HRSV. At 24 hpi the cells were fixed, and the PLA protocol for HRSV N and GFP was performed (Fig. 2E to G). Since it has been known that the HRSV assembly process is independent of Vps4 (11), Vps4 becomes a good PLA negative control. As an additional PLA negative control, HRSV-infected cells were probed for PLA omitting one of the two primary antibodies (Fig. 2H to J). Taken together, these results suggest that HRSV F and N proteins may interact with each other in the Golgi before reaching the plasma membrane.
HRSV N and M proteins partially colocalize with the trans-Golgi network marker TGN46.
Next, we investigated whether HRSV N and M proteins reach the endosomal system and the plasma membrane via the trans-Golgi network (TGN). To this end, we labeled for TGN46, a transmembrane protein that cycles between early endosomes and the TGN, where it is mostly localized at steady state (21). As expected, TGN46 is concentrated in the juxtanuclear region in noninfected cells (Fig. 3A to C). In infected cells, TGN46 partially colocalized with HRSV N and M proteins that were apart from typical inclusion bodies (Fig. 3D to I and P). In addition, superresolution imaging demonstrated that it is possible to see HRSV N, which is not associated with inclusion bodies, appearing tightly associated with the TGN46 (Video S2). However, the colocalization of either HRSV M or N with TGN46 was significantly lower than that of HRSV F and TGN46 (Fig. 3J, L, P to R) at 24 hpi. This is in agreement with a previously published study (14) showing that HRSV N protein is localized in the TGN. However, our findings suggest that the colocalization of TGN46 with the HRSV M and N proteins is moderate. We conclude that the HRSV M and N proteins partially colocalized with TGN46. Interestingly, TGN46 also showed a distribution pattern at the cell periphery and surrounding structures that resemble HRSV inclusion bodies in ring-shaped structures that were apparent at 24 hpi (Fig. 3D to I, pointed by arrowheads in Fig. 3E and H). To rule out immunofluorescence bleeding from the channels coming from the HRSV inclusion bodies, cells were infected with HRSV, and at 48 hpi they were stained for TGN46. To demonstrate that these cells are actually infected, we stained them for HRSV F protein, instead of staining them for HRSV proteins that are components of inclusion bodies (Fig. 3M to O). It is possible to see that ring-shaped structures became more evident at 48 hpi (Fig. 3M to O) and that they are not a result of the fluorescence signal bleeding at the moment of the imaging acquisition. Because the TGN localization of TGN46 is maintained by efficient recycling from endosomes (22), these results may suggest that this retrieval pathway could be compromised in late infection.
HRSV glycosylated and nonglycosylated proteins depend on the Golgi integrity to reach the cell surface.
To further explore the relationship between HRSV structural proteins and the Golgi complex, we treated infected cells with brefeldin A (BFA), a compound that binds Arf1-GDP protein and prevents attachment of coatomer protein complex I (COPI) to the Golgi. BFA treatment is known to reversibly induce Golgi stack disassembly and membrane redistribution to the ER (23, 24). The expected effect of BFA was observed in HEp-2 cells (Fig. 4A to H). Golgi disassembly induced by BFA in HRSV-infected cells led to reduced staining of both HRSV F and N proteins at the cell periphery (Fig. 4I to P). Also, the inclusion bodies appeared smaller in the presence of BFA (Fig. 4K and O and Fig. S2A to F), and the numbers of aggregates stained by HRSV N were significantly diminished in the presence of this drug (Fig. 4K and O and Fig. S2G to I and S3A to U). To reinforce that the phenotype observed was due to the disassembly of the Golgi, BFA was washed out after 5 hours of incubation, and the cells were incubated with fresh medium until 24 hpi. Under these conditions, the normal Golgi apparatus display was recovered, the inclusion bodies became larger, and labeling of the cell periphery filaments of the HRSV F and N proteins was restored (Fig. 4Q to T, arrows). Since our results showed that the BFA had impact in the inclusion body size, we wanted to know if this impact was modulated depending on the timing of BFA addition. To investigate this, HEp-2 cells were infected with HRSV, and at 4, 8, 12, and 20 hpi, the BFA was added and kept in the cell medium. All the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) after 24 hpi and stained for HRSV N and giantin (Golgi), and the size of the inclusion bodies was measured (Fig. S3A to U). Interestingly, the size of inclusion bodies was dependent on the time of BFA addition (Fig. S3A to U), and they were significantly different from the control (Fig. S3U). The colocalization graph showed that the treatment with BFA caused a lower colocalization of HRSV N with giantin when BFA was kept for 20 hours (Fig. S3V). The colocalization of N with giantin increased when BFA was kept for 12 and 16 hours. This was likely due to the giantin dispersion and to the number of HRSV N aggregates. Of note, these experiments do not enable us to state that BFA acts directly on the coalescence of inclusion bodies or impairing the movement of the N protein that is associated with the Golgi. Taken together, these results suggest that normal Golgi integrity is required to deliver both glycosylated F and nonglycosylated N proteins to the cell periphery/surface and that the inclusion body size is affected by BFA treatment in unknown ways.
HRSV M and N proteins colocalize and interact with the early endosome protein sorting nexin 2.
To assess whether HRSV N and M proteins are targeted to early endosomes, immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy for sorting nexin 2 (SNX2) was performed in HEp-2 cells at different times pi. SNX2 plays an important role in the formation of the retromer coat by shaping tubular structures out of the membranes of early endosomes (25), and therefore, it is an appropriate early endosome marker. Different from the normal distribution of SNX2 in noninfected cells (Fig. 5A to C), there was evident colocalization of SNX2 with HRSV N (Fig. 5D to F and J) and M (Fig. 5G to I and K) at 24 hpi. Notably, SNX2 appeared accumulated in the inclusion bodies as confirmed by the plot profiles (Fig. 5J and K). Furthermore, the Mander’s coefficient of colocalization of HRSV N protein with SNX2 was determined at different times pi (Fig. 5L), and the peak of colocalization happened at 8 hpi. To investigate if the nonglycosylated proteins reach endosomes at early stages of infection when inclusion bodies are not apparent, IF was performed for HRSV F, M, and SNX2 at 4 hpi. The experiment revealed that while HRSV F and SNX2 have a better colocalization, HRSV M protein partially colocalized in some SNX2-containing vesicles (Fig. 5M and N), suggesting that part of the HRSV nonglycosylated M proteins are localized in early endosomes at that time of the replication cycle. Seeking a better understanding of the relationship between SNX2 and HRSV inclusion bodies, superresolution imaging was performed for HRSV N and SNX2 (Fig. 6A to Q). It was apparent that SNX2 was mostly located at the edges, but to a lesser extent also within HRSV inclusion bodies (Fig. 6D, H, and Q). In agreement with the data in Fig. 5, once again, HRSV F and N were seen in the same SNX2-containing vesicles (Fig. 6E to H, arrowheads). It is noteworthy that intracellular filaments appeared to be emerging from the same small protein aggregates that contain HRSV F and N proteins and SNX2 (Fig. 6E to H, arrows). As superresolution imaging demonstrated tight proximity between HRSV N and SNX2, PLA was performed to check for a possible interaction between SNX2 and HRSV M protein (Fig. 7). Because HRSV M and N proteins are known to interact with one another (26), they were used as positive controls for the PLA, revealing points of fluorescence distributed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 7E). Interestingly, PLA for HRSV M and SNX2 showed abundant intracellular puncta dispersed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 7F). To confirm that HRSV proteins interact with SNX2 by a different approach, a coimmunoprecipitation assay was performed using an anti-SNX2 antibody. A band corresponding to HRSV N protein was coimmunoprecipitated with SNX2 (Fig. 7D and E, arrowhead). Taken together, the results suggest that HRSV structural proteins interact with SNX2 and may recruit this host protein to virus-induced compartments during assembly.
HRSV selectively recruits endosomal proteins to viral inclusion bodies.
The association of SNX2 with SNX1, Vps26, Vps29, and Vps35 forms the retromer complex, a vesicle coat involved in retrograde transport of proteins from endosomes to the TGN (27). In order to verify whether another retromer component, besides SNX2, is present in structures containing HRSV proteins, IF for Vps26 was performed in HRSV-infected cells at 24 hpi (Fig. 8). Although less intense than for SNX2, and not localized in larger inclusion bodies (Fig. 5 and 6), colocalization of N with Vps26 was clearly visible (Fig. 8A to D). Interestingly, Vps26 colocalization was restricted to tubular structures containing HRSV F and N proteins. These structures could be either tubular endosomal structures (Fig. 8A to D, arrows) or filaments protruding from the plasma membrane (Fig. 8E to H, arrowheads). Importantly, the results indicate that more than one component of the retromer is enriched in structures containing HRSV proteins. Colocalization between HRSV and retromer proteins may be explained by either the recruitment of these host proteins from the cytosol to virus-induced compartments or by the targeting of HRSV proteins to early endosomes. Therefore, to verify whether early endosome elements other than Vps26 were recruited to inclusion bodies, HRSV-infected cells were stained for the early endosome antigen-1 (EEA1). Different from what was observed for SNX2, EEA1 did not colocalize with HRSV inclusion bodies in infected cells at 24 hpi (Fig. S4A to I). This indicates that there is specific relocalization of SNX2 to HRSV inclusion bodies, independent from other early endosome elements.
Fractionation of HRSV-infected cells reveals repositioning of SNX2 in HRSV-infected cells.
To verify the partitioning of SNX2 in different compartments of HRSV-infected cells, cellular fractionation and Western blotting were performed. In HRSV-infected cells, SNX2 accumulates in fractions 1 to 7, which correspond to those that contain the nonglycosylated HRSV proteins that are known to compose the inclusion bodies (Fig. 9). This was in contrast to noninfected cells, in which SNX2 was detected throughout all the fractions. Interestingly, in HRSV-infected cells, TGN46 was detected in fractions 7 to 10, revealing a shift from the normal distribution seen in noninfected cells, in which TGN46 appeared in fractions 4 to 8, suggesting recruitment of TGN46 toward more dense fractions containing plasma membranes (Fig. 9). Importantly, the distribution of lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1 (Lamp-1), the early endosomal marker EEA1, and the plasma membrane protein EGFR appeared to be little affected by HRSV infection.
TGN46 and SNX2 colocalize with HRSV M and N proteins in virus filaments on the cell surface.
In keeping with previous observations that HRSV budding forms typical filamentous shapes on the plasma membrane (28, 29) that contain HRSV M and N proteins (Fig. 10A to F, arrowheads), TGN46 colocalized extensively with those viral proteins in the context of such filaments (Fig. 10G to S). This was reinforced by superresolution microscopy of filament-shaped structures on HRSV-infected cells (Fig. 10T), showing an abundant localization of the TGN46 in the filamentous structures containing the HRSV proteins. Curiously, some of those filaments appeared to be detaching from the cells (Fig. 10T, arrowheads). SNX2 also colocalized with HRSV structural proteins F and M in viral filaments on the cell surface (Fig. 11A to I). Immunogold electron microscopy confirmed the presence of SNX2 in filament-shaped structures at the plasma membrane, as well as in structures apparently budded from HRSV-infected cells (Fig. 11J to M). Together, these results suggest that the HRSV particles may contain SNX2 and TGN46 to some extent.
Silencing of sorting nexins 1 and 2 partially impairs HRSV production and syncytium formation.
Once it was demonstrated that SNX2 colocalizes and interacts with HRSV proteins, a knockdown (KD) experiment was done using small interfering RNA (siRNA) for sorting nexins 1 and 2 in HEp-2 cells (Fig. 12). It is well known that SNX1 and 2 form heterodimers; therefore, siRNA was performed for either SNX1 or SNX2 alone, and for both at the same time, to check for the impact of their silencing in the HRSV replicative cycle. The IF for HRSV N protein at 24 hpi demonstrated that the quantity of the inclusion bodies larger than 5 μm2 were slightly lower in cells KD for SNX2, than in those treated with the scrambled siRNA control (Fig. 12A to H). We chose 5 μm2 as the threshold because Rincheval et al. (18) recently demonstrated that the HRSV mature inclusion bodies were larger than 5 μm2. In addition, cells KD for SNX2 displayed a notable reduction of staining for HRSV N protein in the cell periphery (Fig. 12D and G, arrowheads). Moreover, although syncytium formation in cells silenced for SNX1, SNX2, or SNX1 and 2 was not completely abrogated, there were significantly fewer syncytia in cells silenced for each or both SNX proteins (Fig. 12J to M), than in cells treated with scrambled siRNA (Fig. 12I and M). In agreement with the reduction in syncytium formation, Western blot analysis of HEp-2 cells at 24 hpi showed that the intracellular levels of HRSV G, F, and M proteins were reduced in cells KD for SNX1, SNX2, or SNX1 and 2 in comparison with the control (Fig. 12N). In addition, the immunoblotting of siRNA-treated cells demonstrated a reduction in HRSV protein levels in the supernatants (Fig. 12O). Consistently, there was a significant reduction in HRSV progeny production in cells silenced for SNX1 and 2 at 24 hpi (an approximate 70% reduction in the double KD) (Fig. 12P). Nevertheless, the viral genomic RNA production quantified at 24 hpi was not significantly altered in cells and supernatants upon KD of SNX1, SNX2, or SNX1 and 2 (Fig. 12Q and R), indicating that viral RNA replication was not significantly affected by the reduction in SNX1 and 2 levels in infected cells. Taken together, these data led us to conclude that the KD for the SNXs in HRSV-infected cells had an impact on the quantity of mature inclusion bodies, syncytium formation, HRSV protein amounts, and progeny production.
DISCUSSION
It is well known that the HRSV envelope glycoproteins G, F, and SH traffic through the Golgi apparatus, where the F protein undergoes maturation cleavages (2). However, little is known about the traffic of the HRSV nonglycosylated proteins to virus assembly sites. The present study has shown that the nonglycosylated HRSV structural proteins M and N are detected in association with the secretory pathway and retromer elements, and these are novel findings that contribute to understanding the HRSV assembly process.
In the present study, HRSV M and N proteins partially colocalized with giantin, a specific marker for cis and medial Golgi, mainly at the edges of this organelle. This finding that the traffic of the M protein is associated with membranes is in agreement with results by Henderson et al. (30), who reported an association of the M protein with membrane-enriched fractions of HRSV-infected cells. We have also shown that the HRSV F protein, in the Golgi, partially colocalized with inclusion bodies located at the vicinity of cis and medial Golgi cisternae. Since the N terminus of HRSV F glycoprotein is in the lumen of the Golgi (31), the cytosolic C-terminal portion of F could interact with the nonglycosylated HRSV M and N proteins within inclusion bodies. This was reinforced by results of superresolution microscopy and PLA (Fig. 2) and agrees with what was previously proposed by Ghildyal et al. (32), who suggested that the HRSV G and M proteins interact with one another in the Golgi. Céspedes et al. (14) also addressed the issue of HRSV N protein colocalization with the cis and medial Golgi using another Golgi marker, GALNT2. In the present study, we have expanded that by showing that in addition to the cis and medial Golgi, HRSV M and N proteins only partially colocalized with the TGN46, and this colocalization was significantly less than that of HRSV F with TGN46.
The importance of the Golgi apparatus in the HRSV protein traffic was also supported by experiments in which cell treatment with BFA resulted in smaller HRSV inclusion bodies and reduced N and F proteins in the cell surface, an effect that was reversible by BFA wash out. These observations are also in keeping with data by Céspedes et al. (14), who showed a BFA-induced reduction of N protein in the plasma membrane by flow cytometry. The present study added to that by showing that both HRSV glycosylated F and nonglycosylated N proteins depend on the integrity of the Golgi to traffic to the plasma membrane. Even though we are prone to believed that the lower quantity and size of inclusion bodies in BFA-treated cells is due to the dependency of the Golgi for its traffic, it is not possible to conclude that the inclusion body size was impacted only because of the Golgi disassembly. These phenomena could be due to the effect of BFA directly on the inclusion bodies, and an in-depth study should be done to fully understand it. Another explanation for the partial colocalization of HRSV inclusion bodies with giantin is that, in the HRSV entry process, vesicles containing the virus reach intracellular places near the Golgi region, and perhaps this is the first place where the inclusion bodies will appear, and therefore, as they get bigger they happen to colocalize with the Golgi. However, once again, this does not explain why the inclusion body size and delivery to the plasma membrane are altered by BFA treatment.
It has been previously shown that the HRSV N protein reaches late endosomes, as indicated by colocalization of N with LAMP1, a late endosome marker (14). The present study showed a considerable colocalization of HRSV M and N proteins with SNX2, which is a protein commonly found in association with early endosomes (Fig. 5). This suggests that HRSV inclusion bodies that concentrate nonglycosylated N and M proteins are sites of preferential accumulation of SNX2. Also, the accumulation of SNX2 in HRSV inclusion bodies is not uniform, as seen in Fig. 5E and H, and Fig. S4. We do not know yet what that means; however, Rincheval et al. (18) recently demonstrated that inclusion bodies are dynamic and heterogeneous, and this different pattern of SNX2 accumulation could be due to the inclusion bodies’ heterogeneity and maturation during the course of the HRSV infection.
The HRSV N and M proteins are known to interact with one another (2, 26), which was confirmed by the present PLA results. Also, the present study has shown that the HRSV M and N proteins interact with SNX2, as evidenced by PLA for the M protein, and immunoprecipitation for the N protein. The findings of the present study indicate that there is an association of HRSV nonglycosylated proteins with elements of the secretory pathway. This observation is in agreement with previous demonstration of the recruitment of the adaptor protein complex-3 (AP-3), known to be involved in protein traffic between endosomes and the Golgi (33–35), to HRSV inclusion bodies and its interaction with the HRSV M protein (36). Furthermore, SNX2 was shown to colocalize with the AP-3 complex, which in turn, colocalizes with Vps26 (34, 37). Moreover, a recent study has pointed out the colocalization of HRSV glycosylated G and nonglycosylated proteins in the same vesicles as the glycoprotein G recycles back from the plasma membrane (38).
It was noteworthy that the PLA of the HRSV M protein with SNX2 was seen as numerous puncta throughout the cytoplasm of infected cells. While our results do not confirm that all the PLA dots of M and SNX2 colocalized with HRSV inclusion bodies, considering that they were much more abundant than the viral inclusion bodies at the same time postinfection, it is tempting to speculate that the HRSV M protein traffics through early endosomes before reaching the larger more mature inclusion bodies or the plasma membrane. Since the HRSV M protein is a link between glycosylated and nonglycosylated proteins to form viral particles, its trafficking in association with endosomes could be a help to bridge the glycosylated proteins with RNP-complexed N protein in an endosome, which would facilitate the viral traffic and assembly. However, more studies should be performed to test this hypothesis, such as, for example, expression of the F, M, and N proteins in different combinations to check their capacity to associate with membranes in vitro. In addition, this movement of M protein is reminiscent of what was proposed by Cifuentes-Muñoz et al. (39), who showed that the formation of inclusion bodies of human metapneumovirus, another virus in the family Pneumoviridae, is dynamic, resulting from the coalescence of smaller elements.
It has been previously shown that in HRSV-infected cells, long filamentous structures containing HRSV proteins protrude from intracellular vesicles toward the cytosol (38). Our results showed that such intracellular filaments contain SNX2, suggesting that SNX2 may be involved in their formation. SNX2 and Vps26 are known components of the retromer complex that shapes filaments out of membranes (37), and we have detected Vps26 and SNX2 in vesicles containing HRSV N and F proteins as well as in filamentous structures pinched out from their surfaces, which reinforces that retromer components can be present in vesicles and filaments containing HRSV proteins.
It is well known that HRSV traffic is endosome dependent (2), but exactly how the HRSV nonglycosylated proteins interact with endosomes is not understood. Considering that SNX2 and Vps26 were detected in vesicles containing both glycosylated and nonglycosylated HRSV proteins, we asked if these vesicles could be early endosomes. We did not find detectable recruitment of EEA1, a marker of early endosomes, to HRSV inclusion bodies (Fig. S3), suggesting that SNX2 recruitment to inclusion bodies is selective and that inclusion bodies are not canonical early endosomes. Corroborating these data, cell fractionation showed recruitment of SNX2 to fractions that correspond to inclusion bodies, while EEA1 distribution in cell fractions was not different between HRSV infected and noninfected cells. Moreover, Lamp1, a marker of late endosomes and lysosomes, was very little detected in fractions corresponding to HRSV inclusion bodies, suggesting that these organelles are not components of HRSV inclusion bodies. It is noteworthy that actin was concentrated in cell fractions corresponding to HRSV inclusion bodies, in agreement with previous findings by Shahriari et al. (40).
The results of immunofluorescence and cell fractionation experiments indicate that TGN46 accumulated in the last fraction, which is enriched for plasma membrane (Fig. 9 and 10) in HRSV-infected cells compared to noninfected cells. In addition, TGN46 was shown to be present in HRSV at the plasma membrane by superresolution microscopy, including seemingly detached HRSV buds. Taken together, these results suggest that TGN46 is carried in budded virus particles. Fluorescence findings similar to those obtained for TGN46 were observed for SNX2, which was detected in filamentous structures budding from the plasma membrane. It is interesting also that not all filaments containing HRSV proteins contained TNG46 and SNX2, suggesting that the particles that bud from the plasma membrane are not homogeneous.
One should keep in mind that TGN46 recycling from the plasma membrane back to the trans-Golgi could be compromised in HRSV-infected cells, since SNX2, which is part of the retromer complex, is recruited by inclusion bodies.
Importantly, the knockdown of SNX1 and 2 had a negative impact on several HRSV processes. First, upon cell silencing for these two proteins, alone or in combination, the amounts of intracellular HRSV F, G, and M proteins were reduced, and the HRSV inclusion bodies were smaller than in control cells at 24 hpi. Moreover, the knockdown for SNX1, 2, or both resulted in significantly smaller syncytia (Fig. 12). While the knockdown for sorting nexins did not affect HRSV replication as indicated by genome copy quantities at 24 hpi, the titers of infectious virus in the supernatant were significantly reduced in cells simultaneously silenced for SNX1 and 2. It is possible that the silencing of SNX1 and 2 may have altered the final content of structural proteins in progeny virions compared to controls, which might have affected the quantification of progeny production by plaque assay. These findings should be interpreted with caution since previous studies have shown that even HRSV particles lacking envelope G and SH glycoproteins retain infectivity (12, 13), which could help to explain the moderate reduction seen in virus titers produced in cells silenced for SNX1, SNX2, and SNX1 and 2. SNX1 and 2 are part of the retromer complex, which is involved in the transport of cargo from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network (41). It has also been shown that in the absence of SNX1 and 2, some proteins that depend on the retromer complex for their traffic are addressed to lysosomal compartments for degradation (25). This could explain why in cells silenced for SNX1 and SNX2, there was a reduction in amounts of F protein and smaller syncytia at 24 hpi.
In summary, the present study contributed findings that help to establish the importance of the secretory pathway in the traffic of HRSV nonglycosylated structural proteins and showed for the first time the involvement of retromer proteins in the biogenesis of HRSV particles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and virus.
HEp-2 cells were grown in minimal essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and maintained in MEM with 2% FBS in 5% CO2 at 37°C. HRSV-A of the strain Long (ATCC VR-26) was propagated in HEp-2 cells, and the stock was titrated by plaque assay using routine methods (42).
HRSV in vitro infection.
Infection assays were done on glass coverslips inside 24-well plates, using HRSV stock diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to reach a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1, with 1 hour of incubation at 4°C to synchronize virus entrance. Then, coverslips were washed three times in cold PBS, replenished with MEM with 2% FBS at 37°C, and then incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C. At 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hpi the coverslips were fixed. For the immunoprecipitation and cell fractionation assays, HEp-2 cell monolayers were prepared in 75-cm2 flasks, infected at MOIs of 0.1 and 1, and harvested at appropriate times.
Immunofluorescence.
At appropriate times, coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 10 minutes at room temperature and then washed once with PBS, permeabilized with 0.01% Triton in PBS for 20 minutes, and then blocked with PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 minutes. After 10 washes with PBS, coverslips were incubated with the primary antibody for one hour at 37°C and then washed 10 times with PBS and incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 hour at 37°C. Coverslips were washed 10 times in PBS and once in distilled water and then mounted on glass slides using Flouromount. Nuclei were stained with DAPI, and images were acquired on Leica SP5 or Zeiss 780 confocal microscopes or a Nikon N-SIM microscope (super resolution imaging) and were analyzed using ImageJ software Fiji.
Antibodies.
The antibodies used for immunofluorescence (IF) were rabbit polyclonal anti-TGN46 (ABT95; Millipore), sheep polyclonal anti-TGN46 (Abd Serotec AHP500; Bio-Rad), rabbit polyclonal anti-SNX2 and anti-VPS26 (gifts from C. Haft, NIDDK, NIH) (43), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) anti-HRSV F protein (133-1H MAB8262X; Millipore), mouse MAb anti-HRSV N protein labeled with FITC (MAB858-3F N; Millipore), mouse polyclonal anti-HRSV M protein (44), rabbit polyclonal anti-giantin (PRB-114C-200; Covance), mouse MAb anti-RSV F protein (MAB8599; Millipore), rabbit polyclonal anti-Lamp-1 D2D11 XPR (9091T; Cell Signaling), mouse MAb anti-EEA1 (610457; BD), rabbit polyclonal HRS (ab155539), Alexa Fluor 594-labeled goat anti-rabbit (ab150080; Abcam), Alexa Fluor 647-labeled goat anti-mouse (ab150115; Abcam), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-mouse (A21202; Invitrogen), and Alexa Fluor 647-labeled donkey anti-sheep (A21448 Thermo Fisher).
Transmission electron microscopy.
HEp-2 cells grown to 80 to 100% confluence were infected with HRSV at an MOI of 1, and at the appropriate time, the culture was fixed in a mixture containing 0.05% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, and 0.025% calcium chlorate in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 in a microwave oven for 7 seconds at maximum potency. Cells were then washed in 50 mM glycine in PBS for 15 minutes, incubated with 1% BSA in PBS for 45 minutes under gentle shaking, and then permeabilized with 0.05% saponin diluted in PBS with 1% BSA (PBS-BSA) for 30 minutes. Cells were then incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-SNX2 antibody diluted in PBS with 1% BSA for 2 hours at room temperature under gentle shaking. After that, cells were washed four times for 5 minutes each with PBS containing 1% BSA, followed by incubation with anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with 6 nm colloidal gold (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 hour at room temperature, washed twice with cacodylate buffer, and soaked overnight in the same buffer. The next day, cells were washed three times for 5 minutes each with fresh cacodylate buffer, followed by three 5-minute washes with 1% BSA in PBS and three 5-minute washes in distilled water. Next, the preparations were incubated with gold enhancement mixture (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY) for 8 minutes and then washed with distilled water. Cells were then treated for 2 hours with 1% osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in 50% to 100% alcohol series for three 5-minute changes of each dilution. Cell monolayers were detached with propylene oxide and pelleted for 10 minutes at 18,400 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C in an Eppendorf 5254R. Cell pellets were washed twice with propylene oxide, embedded overnight in EMBED 812 1:1 in propylene oxide, contrasted, and analyzed in a Jeol JEM-100 CXII transmission electron microscope.
Immunoblotting.
HEp-2 cells infected with HRSV were harvested at appropriate times postinfection using 0.05% EDTA, suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% [vol/vol] Glicerol, EDTA 5 mM, 1% Triton 100X) for 25 minutes on ice and centrifuged at 18,400 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C in an Eppendorf 5254R to separate the nuclear fraction. The supernatant was collected and separated in 10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Subsequently, the nitrocellulose membrane was incubated with the appropriate antibody, namely, goat anti-RSV (ab20745; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-TGN46 (ABT95; Millipore), sheep polyclonal anti-TGN46 (A21448; Thermofisher), rabbit polyclonal anti-SNX1, rabbit polyclonal anti-SNX2, rabbit polyclonal anti-GAPDH (G9595, Sigma), mouse anti-beta actin (sc-47778; Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-EGFR (AB52894; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-EEA1 (612656; BD Biosciences), and rabbit polyclonal anti-LAMP1 (anti-CD107-A, 555798; BD Biosciences). Except for anti-beta actin antibody, which was incubated for 1 hour, all the others were incubated overnight. This was followed by three 5-minute washes in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20, and then incubation was done with the secondary antibodies, namely, HRP-goat anti-rabbit (656120; Invitrogen), HRP-rabbit anti-goat (305 035 003; Jackson ImmunoResearch), and HRP-rabbit anti-mouse (A9044; Sigma), and then detected with luminol. The images were acquired in a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc.
Immunoprecipitation.
The protocol used was published by Sugrue et al. (45). Briefly, HEp-2 cells were infected with HRSV at an MOI of 0.1 for 48 hours and then detached with 0.05% EDTA in PBS for 15 minutes. Cells were lysed with lysis buffer followed by clarification and incubation overnight with primary rabbit polyclonal antibody to SNX2 (HPA037400; Sigma-Aldrich) and then incubated with G protein-coupled Sepharose beads (17061801; GE Healthcare) for 3 hours. After three washes in the same buffer, elution was done with beta-mercaptoethanol in sample buffer and subjected to electrophoresis with transference to a nitrocellulose membrane. Immunoblots were done with rabbit anti-SNX2 (SNX2 (HPA037400; Sigma-Aldrich) and goat anti-RSV (ab20745; Abcam), followed by incubation with HRP-goat anti-rabbit (656120; Invitrogen) or HRP-rabbit anti-goat. The images were acquired in a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc.
Proximity ligation assay (PLA).
HEp-2 cells were grown on coverslips and inoculated with HRSV at an MOI of 1 or mock, and after 24 hours, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 15 minutes and permeabilized with 0.01% saponin in PBS. The cells were incubated with a block solution from the PLA kit (DUO82049; Duolink in situ) and then with primary antibodies in the following combinations: rabbit polyclonal anti-RSV N and mouse polyclonal anti-RSV M, or rabbit polyclonal anti-SNX2 and mouse polyclonal anti-RSV M. HRSV and mock-inoculated cells were incubated only with mouse anti-HRSV M as biological and technical controls, respectively. After primary antibodies, the cells were incubated with the PLA probes, and the preparation was subjected to the steps proposed by the manufacturers. Lastly, the coverslips were washed five times with the buffer solution provided by the PLA kit, mounted with Fluoromount, and analyzed in a Zeiss laser scanning 780 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
Real-time PCR.
The cells and supernatants from small interfering RNA experiments were collected and treated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) in a proportion of 750 μl of TRIzol to 250 μl of sample. The RNA extraction was done using the TRIzol protocol proposed in the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was carried out with the high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Life/Applied Biosystems, USA) using the manufacturer-provided protocol. Briefly, cDNA was obtained from 1 mg of total RNA denatured at 95°C for 5 minutes in the presence of 20 mM primer directed to sequences within the leader-NS1 gene of the HRSV genome. Tubes were kept on ice for 5 minutes while the reactions were assembled with 2 μl of 10 × RT buffer, 0.8 μl of 100 mM dNTP, 1 μl of MultiScribe reverse transcriptase, and water up to the volume of 20 μl. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 minutes at 25°C and then for 120 minutes at 37°C, and 5 minutes at 85°C. The PCR mixture contained 5 μl of SYBR green PCR master mix (Kappa, USA), 20 nM forward and reverse primers to the HRSV leader region (forward ACA ACA AAC TTG CGT AAA CCA AAA, reverse CCA TGC TAC TTC ATC ATT GTC AAA CA), 1 μl of specific cDNA, and water to a final volume of 10 μl. Cycling parameters were 50°C for 2 minutes and 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute; subsequently, one cycle was done of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 95°C for 15 seconds, and specific amplification was confirmed by analyzing the melting curve. Samples were set up in triplicate on a thermocycler ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems).
Small interfering RNA assays for SNX1 and SNX2.
HEp-2 cells were seeded in 12-well plates (containing coverslips) in 40% of confluence; the second siRNA shot (40 nM each siRNA per well) was performed and 48 hours after the first shot, and then the cells were infected with HRSV (MOI = 1). Then, 24 and 48 hours postinfection, the supernatant and cells were harvested for plaque assay, IF, real-time PCR, and Western blot analyses as described above. The sequences of each siRNA were siSNX1 (AUG AAG AAC AAG ACC AAG AGC CCA C) (IDT, Inc., Brazil) and siSNX2 (AAG UCC AUC AUC UCC ACC AAG AGC CAC). The scramble sequence was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, Brazil.
Drug treatment.
HEp-2 cells were seeded on coverslips and infected with HRSV (MOI = 1), and 4 hours postinfection, fresh medium was replenished (2% FSB in MEM) containing 10 μM brefeldin A (BFA) in DMSO or DMSO alone. The media containing BFA or DMSO vehicle were maintained for 5 hours, and then BFA or vehicle was washed out, while other wells were maintained to complete 19 hours of drug treatment and 24 hours of infection. Then, after 24 hours of infection, all the cells were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS. After fixation, the cells were subjected to IF as described above. For the experiment reported in Fig. S3, the HEp-2 cells were infected with HRSV at an MOI of 1. Next, 4, 8, 12, and 20 hours postinfection, the cells were incubated with medium (2% FSB in MEM) containing 10 μM BFA. Then, 24 hpi, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA, and stained for HRSV N, giantin, and DAPI.
Cell fractionation.
This protocol was based on a previous paper by Perez-Victoria (22, 46). HEp-2 cells were infected with HRSV (MOI = 1). After 24 hours, the supernatant from infected and mock-infected cells was discarded, and the monolayers were washed three times with PBS, followed by detaching with PBS with 0.5M EDTA. The cells were subjected to centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 minutes; the pellets were washed with PBS and with STE buffer (250 mM sucrose, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, with protease inhibitors) to produce an osmotic shock. Cells were passed 20 times through a 25G needle for cell lysis in 0.5 ml of STE buffer without sucrose. The cell homogenates were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 2 minutes to remove nuclear contents, and the post-nuclear supernatants were loaded on top of a discontinuous 10 to 30% (wt/vol) glycerol gradient in STE buffer, laid on 0.5 ml of 80% sucrose cushion in ultracentrifuge tubes. After that, tubes were centrifuged at 29,000 rpm for 2 hours in a Thermo TH629 rotor. After centrifugations, fractions (1.250 ml) were carefully collected from top to bottom of the ultracentrifuge tubes. Then, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added to each collected fraction for protein concentration, and the pellet was suspended in sample buffer with 4% beta-mercaptoethanol. The samples were heated at 95°C, loaded in 10% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and analyzed by Western blotting.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We appreciated the expert technical support of Maria Dolores Seabra Ferreira and Jose Augusto Maulin (FMRP-USP Electron Microscopy Facility) and Elizabete Rosa Milani and Roberta Ribeiro Costa Rosales (FMRP-USP Bioimaging Facility).
This work was supported by a grant from the State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grant no. 2013/16349-2). We thank the funding agencies CNPq and CAPES (Brazilian Ministry of Education) for the scholarships.
We also thank all the members of the lab for the valuable scientific discussions and Katherine R. Spindler for helpful suggestions.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Eurico Arruda, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Carolina Lopez, Washington University in St Louis, and Reena Ghildyal, University of Canberra.
Citation Cardoso RS, Tavares LA, Jesus BLS, Criado MF, de Carvalho AN, Souza JDP, Bedi S, de Souza MM, Silva ML, Lanfredi GP, Vitti BC, Scudero OB, Faça VM, Ono A, Ventura AM, daSilva LLP, Arruda E. 2020. Host retromer protein sorting nexin 2 interacts with human respiratory syncytial virus structural proteins and is required for efficient viral production. mBio 11:e01869-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01869-20.
REFERENCES
- 1.Nair H, Brooks WA, Katz M, Roca A, Berkley JA, Madhi SA, Simmerman JM, Gordon A, Sato M, Howie S, Krishnan A, Ope M, Lindblade KA, Carosone-Link P, Lucero M, Ochieng W, Kamimoto L, Dueger E, Bhat N, Vong S, Theodoratou E, Chittaganpitch M, Chimah O, Balmaseda A, Buchy P, Harris E, Evans V, Katayose M, Gaur B, O’Callaghan-Gordo C, Goswami D, Arvelo W, Venter M, Briese T, Tokarz R, Widdowson M-A, Mounts AW, Breiman RF, Feikin DR, Klugman KP, Olsen SJ, Gessner BD, Wright PF, Rudan I, Broor S, Simões EAF, Campbell H. 2011. Global burden of respiratory infections due to seasonal influenza in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 378:1917–1930. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Collins PL, Karrib RA. 2013. Respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus, p 1086–1123. In Knipe MD, Howley MP (ed), Fields virology, 6th ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Feldman SS, Hendry RM, Beeler JS. 1999. Identification of a linear heparin binding domain for human respiratory syncytial virus attachment glycoprotein G. J Virol 73:6610–6617. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.8.6610-6617.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feldman SA, Audet S, Beeler JA. 2000. The fusion glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus facilitates virus attachment and infectivity via an interaction with cellular heparan sulfate. J Virol 74:6442–6447. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.14.6442-6447.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tayyari F, Marchant D, Moraes TJ, Duan W, Mastrangelo P, Hegele RG. 2011. Identification of nucleolin as a cellular receptor for human respiratory syncytial virus. Nat Med 17:1132–1135. doi: 10.1038/nm.2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.González-Reyes L, Ruiz-Argüello MB, García-Barreno B, Calder L, López JA, Albar JP, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC, Melero JA. 2001. Cleavage of the human respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein at two distinct sites is required for activation of membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9859–9864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151098198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roberts SR, Compans RW, Wertz GW. 1995. Respiratory syncytial virus matures at the apical surfaces of polarized epithelial cells. J Virol 69:2667–2673. doi: 10.1128/JVI.69.4.2667-2673.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brock SC, Goldenring JR, Crowe JE. 2003. Apical recycling systems regulate directional budding of respiratory syncytial virus from polarized epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15143–15148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2434327100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brown G, Aitken J, Rixon HWM, Sugrue RJ. 2002. Caveolin-1 is incorporated into mature respiratory syncytial virus particles during virus assembly on the surface of virus-infected cells. J Gen Virol 83:611–621. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-3-611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oomens AGP, Bevis KP, Wertz GW. 2006. The cytoplasmic tail of the human respiratory syncytial virus F protein plays critical roles in cellular localization of the F protein and infectious progeny production. J Virol 80:10465–10477. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01439-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Utley TJ, Ducharme NA, Varthakavi V, Shepherd BE, Santangelo PJ, Lindquist ME, Goldenring JR, Crowe JE. 2008. Respiratory syncytial virus uses a Vps4-independent budding mechanism controlled by Rab11-FIP2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10209–10214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712144105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Batonick M, Oomens AGP, Wertz GW. 2008. Human respiratory syncytial virus glycoproteins are not required for apical targeting and release from polarized epithelial cells. J Virol 82:8664–8672. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00827-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Techaarpornkul S, Barretto N, Peeples ME. 2001. Functional analysis of recombinant respiratory syncytial virus deletion mutants lacking the small hydrophobic and/or attachment glycoprotein gene. J Virol 75:6825–6834. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.6825-6834.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Céspedes PF, Bueno SM, Ramírez BA, Gomez RS, Riquelme SA, Palavecino CE, Mackern-Oberti JP, Mora JE, Depoil D, Sacristán C, Cammer M, Creneguy A, Nguyen TH, Riedel CA, Dustin ML, Kalergis AM. 2014. Surface expression of the hRSV nucleoprotein impairs immunological synapse formation with T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E3214–E3223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400760111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Förster A, Maertens GN, Farrell PJ, Bajorek M. 2015. Dimerization of matrix protein is required for budding of respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 89:e03500-14. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03500-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kipper S, Hamad S, Caly L, Avrahami D, Bacharach E, Jans DA, Gerber D, Bajorek M. 2015. New host factors important for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) replication revealed by a novel microfluidics screen for interactors of matrix (M) protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 14:532–543. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mitra R, Baviskar P, Duncan-Decocq RR, Patel D, Oomens AGP. 2012. The human respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein is required for maturation of viral filaments. J Virol 86:4432–4443. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06744-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rincheval V, Lelek M, Gault E, Bouillier C, Sitterlin D, Blouquit-Laye S, Galloux M, Zimmer C, Eleouet J-F, Rameix-Welti M-A. 2017. Functional organization of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in cells infected by respiratory syncytial virus. Nat Commun 8 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00655-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Collins PL, Mottet G. 1991. Post-translational processing and oligomerization of the fusion glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus. J Gen Virol 72:3095–3101. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-12-3095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zimmer G, Budz L, Herrler G. 2001. Proteolytic activation of respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. Cleavage at two furin consensus sequences. J Biol Chem 276:31642–31650. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102633200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Banting G, Maile R, Roquemore EP. 1998. The steady state distribution of humTGN46 is not significantly altered in cells defective in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J Cell Sci 111:3451–3458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Perez-Victoria FJ, Mardones GA, Bonifacino JS. 2008. Requirement of the human GARP complex for mannose 6-phosphate-receptor-dependent sorting of cathepsin D to lysosomes. Mol Biol Cell 19:2350–2362. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujiwara T, Oda K, Yokota S, Takatsuki A, Ikehara Y. 1988. Brefeldin A causes disassembly of the Golgi complex and accumulation of secretory proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 363:18545–18552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sciaky N, Presley J, Smith C, Zaal KJM, Cole N, Moreira JE, Terasaki M, Siggia E, Lippincott-Schwartz J. 1997. Golgi tubule traffic and the effects of brefeldin A visualized in living cells. J Cell Biol 138:1137–1155. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.5.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gullapalli A, Garrett TA, Paing MM, Griffin CT, Yang Y, Trejo J. 2004. A role for sorting nexin 2 in epidermal growth factor receptor down-regulation: evidence for distinct functions of sorting nexin 1 and 2 in protein trafficking. Mol Biol Cell 15:2143–2155. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oliveira AP, Simabuco FM, Tamura RE, Guerrero MC, Ribeiro PGG, Libermann TA, Zerbini LF, Ventura AM. 2013. Human respiratory syncytial virus N, P and M protein interactions in HEK-293T cells. Virus Res 177:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shi H, Rojas R, Bonifacino JS, Hurley JH. 2006. The retromer subunit Vps26 has an arrestin fold and binds Vps35 through its C-terminal domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:540–548. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shaikh FY, Utley TJ, Craven RE, Rogers MC, Lapierre LA, Goldenring JR, Crowe JE. 2012. Respiratory syncytial virus assembles into structured filamentous virion particles independently of host cytoskeleton and related proteins. PLoS One 7:e40826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ke Z, Dillard R, Chirkova T, Leon F, Stobart C, Hampton C, Strauss J, Rajan D, Rostad C, Taylor J, Yi H, Shah R, Jin M, Hartert T, Peebles R, Graham B, Moore M, Anderson L, Wright E. 2018. The morphology and assembly of respiratory syncytial virus revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Viruses 10:446. doi: 10.3390/v10080446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Henderson G, Murray J, Yeo RP. 2002. Sorting of the respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein into detergent-resistant structures is dependent on cell-surface expression of the glycoproteins. Virology 300:244–254. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McLellan JS, Chen M, Leung S, Graepel KW, Du X, Yang Y, Zhou T, Baxa U, Yasuda E, Beaumont T, Kumar A, Modjarrad K, Zheng Z, Zhao M, Xia N, Kwong PD, Graham BS. 2013. Structure of RSV fusion glycoprotein trimer bound to a prefusion-specific neutralizing antibody. Science 340:1113–1117. doi: 10.1126/science.1234914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ghildyal R, Li D, Peroulis I, Shields B, Bardin PG, Teng MN, Collins PL, Meanger J, Mills J. 2005. Interaction between the respiratory syncytial virus G glycoprotein cytoplasmic domain and the matrix protein. J Gen Virol 86:1879–1884. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80829-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Peden AA, Oorschot V, Hesser BA, Austin CD, Scheller RH, Klumperman J. 2004. Localization of the AP-3 adaptor complex defines a novel endosomal exit site for lysosomal membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 164:1065–1076. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200311064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Da Silva EZM, Freitas-Filho EG, De Souza-Júnior DA, Da Silva LLP, Jamur MC, Oliver C. 2017. Adaptor protein-3: a key player in RBL-2H3 mast cell mediator release. PLoS One 12:e0173462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hirst J, D Barlow L, Francisco GC, Sahlender DA, Seaman MNJ, Dacks JB, Robinson MS. 2011. The fifth adaptor protein complex. PLoS Biol 9:e1001170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ward C, Maselko M, Lupfer C, Prescott M, Pastey MK. 2017. Interaction of the human respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein with cellular adaptor protein complex 3 plays a critical role in trafficking. PLoS One 12:e0184629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rojas R, van Vlijmen T, Mardones GA, Prabhu Y, Rojas AL, Mohammed S, Heck AJR, Raposo G, van der Sluijs P, Bonifacino JS. 2008. Regulation of retromer recruitment to endosomes by sequential action of Rab5 and Rab7. J Cell Biol 183:513–526. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200804048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vanover D, Smith DV, Blanchard EL, Alonas E, Kirschman JL, Lifland AW, Zurla C, Santangelo PJ. 2017. RSV glycoprotein and genomic RNA dynamics reveal filament assembly prior to the plasma membrane. Nat Commun 8:667. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00732-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cifuentes-Muñoz N, Branttie J, Slaughter KB, Dutch RE. 2017. Human metapneumovirus induces formation of inclusion bodies for efficient genome replication and transcription. J Virol 91:e01282-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01282-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shahriari S, Wei K, Ghildyal R. 2018. Respiratory syncytial virus matrix (M) protein interacts with actin in vitro and in cell culture. Viruses 10:535. doi: 10.3390/v10100535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rojas R, Kametaka S, Haft CR, Bonifacino JS. 2007. Interchangeable but essential functions of SNX1 and SNX2 in the association of retromer with endosomes and the trafficking of mannose 6-phosphate receptors. Mol Cell Biol 27:1112–1124. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00156-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McKimm-Breschkin JL. 2004. A simplified plaque assay for respiratory syncytial virus: direct visualization of plaques without immunostaining. J Virol Methods 120:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Haft CR, Sierra MDLL, Bafford R, Lesniak MA, Barr VA, Taylor SI. 2000. Human orthologs of yeast vacuolar protein sorting proteins Vps26, 29, and 35: assembly into multimeric complexes. Mol Biol Cell 11:4105–4116. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carromeu C, Simabuco FM, Tamura RE, Farinha Arcieri LE, Ventura AM. 2007. Intracellular localization of human respiratory syncytial virus L protein. Arch Virol 152:2259–2263. doi: 10.1007/s00705-007-1048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Low KW, Tan T, Ng K, Tan BH, Sugrue RJ. 2008. The RSV F and G glycoproteins interact to form a complex on the surface of infected cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 306:308–313. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tavares AL, de Carvalho J, Costa CS, Silveira RM, Carvalho NA, Donadi AE, DaSilva LLP. 2020. Two functional variants of AP-1 complexes composed of either γ2 or γ1 subunits are independently required for major histocompatibility complex class I downregulation by HIV-1 Nef. J Virol 94 doi: 10.1128/JVI.02039-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.