TABLE 4.
PRO Concept/Instrument | Frequency, n (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PBC (n = 642) | PSC (n = 177) | Both (n = 107) | Total Concepts (n = 926) | |
PRURITUS TOTAL | 166 (25.9) | 39 (22.0) | 26 (24.3) | 231 (25.0) |
No Instrument | 76 (45.8) | 22 (56.4) | 1 (3.8) | 99 (42.9) |
Itch Assessment With Visual Analog Scale | 33 (19.9) | 6 (15.4) | 18 (69.2) | 57 (24.7) |
Likert/Numeric Grading Scale NOS | 28 (16.9) | 6 (15.4) | 2 (7.7) | 36 (15.6) |
5‐D Itch Scale | 9 (5.4) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0) | 10 (4.3) |
PBC‐40 | 8 (4.8)* | 0 (0) | 1 (3.8) | 9 (3.9) |
Pruritus numeric rating scale (0‐10) | 2 (1.2) | 2 (5.1) | 1 (3.8) | 5 (2.2) |
Diary NOS | 2 (1.2) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.3) |
Visual Analog Scale NOS | 2 (1.2) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.3) |
Itch Diary (Patient‐Reported Symptom Questionnaire) | 1 (0.6)* | 0 (0) | 1 (3.8) | 2 (0.9) |
Itch Severity Scale | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.8) | 2 (0.9) |
Other ‡ | 4 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.8) | 5 (2.0) |
FATIGUE TOTAL | 130 (20.3) | 28 (15.8) | 14 (13.1) | 172 (18.6) |
No instrument | 50 (38.5) | 14 (50.0) | 0 (0) | 64 (37.2) |
Fatigue Impact Scale | 35 (26.9) † | 6 (21.4) | 4 (28.6) | 45 (26.2) |
Likert/Numeric Grading Scale NOS | 12 (9.2) | 3 (10.7) | 0 (0) | 15 (8.7) |
PBC‐40 | 13 (10.0)* | 1 (3.6) † | 0 (0) | 14 (8.1) |
Visual Analog Scale NOS | 4 (3.1) | 4 (14.3) | 6 (42.9) | 14 (8.1) |
Fisk Fatigue Severity Scale | 5 (3.9) † | 0 (0) | 3 (21.4) | 8 (4.7) |
Krupp’s Fatigue Severity Scale | 4 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (2.3) |
Fatigue Diary | 3 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.7) |
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale | 2 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.1) | 2 (1.2) |
Other ‡ | 2 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.8) |
BROAD HRQOL TOTAL | 82 (12.8) | 34 (19.2) | 30 (28.0) | 146 (15.8) |
SF‐36 | 20 (24.4) | 11 (32.4) | 13 (43.3) | 44 (30.1) |
PBC‐40 | 35 (42.7)* | 5 (14.7) † | 3 (10.0) | 42 (28.8) |
Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire | 5 (6.1)* | 4 (11.8)* | 3 (10.0) | 12 (8.2) |
PBC‐27 | 4 (4.9)* | 3 (8.8) † | 1 (3.3) | 8 (5.5) |
Likert/Numeric Grading Scale NOS | 4 (4.9) | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 5 (3.4) |
Nottingham Health Profile | 3 (3.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (2.1) |
NIDDK‐QA | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 3 (2.1) |
Visual Analog Scale NOS | 3 (3.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (2.1) |
15D | 0 (0) | 1 (2.9) | 1 (3.3) | 2 (1.4) |
No instrument | 1 (1.2) | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 2 (1.4) |
Other ‡ | 7 (8.5) | 8 (23.5) | 7 (23.3) | 2219 (15.1) |
GASTROINTESTINAL AEs/TREATMENT SIDE EFFECTS TOTAL | 41 (6.4) | 10 (5.7) | 8 (7.5) | 59 (6.4) |
No instrument | 37 (90.2) | 10 (100) | 8 (100) | 55 (93.2) |
Likert/Numeric Grading Scale NOS | 2 (4.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.4) |
Diary NOS | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.7) |
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.7) |
PHYSICAL AEs/TREATMENT SIDE EFFECTS TOTAL | 34 (5.3) | 8 (4.5) | 9 (8.4) | 51 (5.5) |
No instrument | 31 (91.2) | 7 (87.5) | 9 (100) | 47 (92.1) |
Likert/Numeric Grading Scale NOS | 1 (2.9) | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.9) |
Diary NOS | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) |
Itch Assessment With Visual Analog Scale | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) |
Bolded instruments denote instruments that were either developed in the target population or subsequently underwent psychometric testing in the target population.
Instrument was developed with input from the target population.
Instrument was not developed with input from the target population but later underwent psychometric testing in the target population.
Pooled total of remainder of instruments used to measure the PRO concept (given the low frequency of each instrument being used per PRO concept found in the total population).
Abbreviation: GI, gastrointestinal.