Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;156(12):1–11. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260

Table 2. Primary and Key Secondary Outcomes in the Intention-to-Treat Populationa.

Outcome Placebo and TCSs (n = 109) 2 mg of Baricitinib and TCSs (n = 109) 4 mg of Baricitinib and TCSs (n = 111)
All Comparison with placebo (95% CI) P valueb All Comparison with placebo (95% CI) P valueb
Primary outcome
vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1c 16 (15) 26 (24) 1.9 (0.9 to 3.9) .08 34 (31) 2.8 (1.4 to 5.6) .004
Key secondary outcomes
EASI75c 25 (23) 47 (43) 2.6 (1.4 to 4.8) NA 53 (48) 3.3 (1.8 to 6.0) <.001
Percent change from baseline in total EASI score, LSM (SE)d −45.1 (3.8) −58.2 (3.7) −13.1 (−23.4 to −2.7) NA −67.2 (3.7) −22.1 (−32.5 to −11.8) <.001
≥4-Point improvement in Itch NRS scorec
Day 2 2/104 (2) 5/97 (5) 2.4 (0.6 to 10.5) NA 8/100 (8) 3.9 (1.0 to 15.8) NA
Week 1 4/104 (4) 8/97 (8) 2.1 (0.7 to 6.8) NA 9/100 (9) 2.5 (0.8 to 8.0) NA
Week 2 16/104 (15) 23/97 (24) 1.8 (0.9 to 3.8) NA 33/100 (33) 3.1 (1.5 to 6.2) NA
Week 4 11/104 (11) 33/97 (34) 4.7 (2.2 to 10.0) NA 52/100 (52) 10.4 (4.9 to 22.2) <.001
Week 16 21/104 (20) 37/97 (38) 2.9 (1.5 to 5.6) NA 44/100 (44) 3.8 (2.0 to 7.5) <.001
Change from baseline, LSM (SE)d
Skin Pain NRS −2.1 (0.2) −3.2 (0.2) −1.2 (−1.8 to −0.5) NA −3.7 (0.2) −1.7 (−2.3 to −1.0) <.001
Item 2 of the ADSS at week 1 −0.5 (0.1) −0.7 (0.1) −0.2 (−0.5 to 0.0) NA −0.9 (0.1) −0.4 (−0.7 to −0.2) NA
Item 2 of the ADSS at week 16 −0.5 (0.2) −1.3 (0.1) −0.8 (−1.2 to −0.4) NA −1.4 (0.1) −0.9 (−1.3 to −0.5) NA
EASI90c 15 (14) 18 (17) 1.2 (0.6 to 2.6) NA 27 (24) 2.1 (1.0 to 4.2) NA
SCORAD75c 8 (7) 12 (11) 1.5 (0.6 to 3.8) NA 20 (18) 2.7 (1.2 to 6.3) NA

Abbreviations: ADSS, Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; LSM, least-squares mean; NA, not applicable; NRS, Numeric Rating Scale; SCORAD, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis; TCS, topical corticosteroid; vIGA-AD, validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis.

a

Data are presented as number (percentage) of patients unless otherwise indicated. Data were assessed at week 16 unless otherwise specified. Data were analyzed with a logistic regression model with nonresponder imputation for response rates and mixed-models repeated-measure analysis for LSM change and percent change from baseline. P values are for comparisons of 2 or 4 mg of baricitinib with placebo.

b

To control the overall familywise type l error rate for multiple comparisons, the primary and key secondary end points were analyzed according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan with a graphical testing procedure. Results are shown for the US and Japan graphical testing procedure.

c

Comparisons are odds ratios.

d

Comparisons are LSM difference.