Table 2.
Pore size of filter | Oyster number | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
1.2 µM | ITS1 | – | 35.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
18S | – | 33.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 35.9 | |
ELF1α | 31.9 | 28.2 | 29.8 | 32.8 | 32.4 | 30.9 | 32.8 | 30.3 | – | 33.3 | |
10 µM | ITS1 | – | 32.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 36.3 | – |
18S | 35.3 | 34.7 | – | 33.8 | 31.5 | – | – | – | 34.2 | – | |
ELF1α | 27.8 | 25.5 | 26.8 | 27 | 29.4 | 28.1 | 28.2 | 27.8 | 26.3 | 27.3 |
Water samples were filtrated using filters with pore sizes of first 10 µM and then 1.2 µM. Threshold was set to 37, thus all Ct values below 37 were regarded as positive for B. ostreae. “No Ct” values are indicated by a minus (−). The Ct value of the positive control was ~ 30 for ITS1, ~ 28 for 18S and ~ 29 for ELF 1α. Values in italics represent samples, where one qPCR reaction resulted in “No Ct” value and the other a Ct value below 37. These samples were regarded as under suspicion of including B. ostreae eDNA.