Table 4.
Independent variable | Emotional exhaustion | Professional inefficacy | Depersonalization | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictive variable | ΔR2 | β | B | SE | ΔR2 | β | B | SE | ΔR2 | β | B | SE | |
Step 1 | Demographic variablesa | ||||||||||||
Step 2 | Deep acting | 0.028∗∗ | -0.172∗∗ | -0.393 | 0.147 | 0.130∗∗ | -0.368∗∗ | -0.708 | 0.122 | 0.061∗∗ | -0.251∗∗ | -0.524 | 0.134 |
Step 3 | HCCb | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.272 | 0.000 | -0.002 | -0.008 | 0.227 | 0.003 | -0.060 | -0.231 | 0.247 |
Step 4 | DA×HCCc | 0.017∗ | -0.133∗ | -0.845 | 0.400 | 0.001 | 0.026 | 0.137 | 0.337 | 0.030∗∗ | -0.174∗∗ | -1.010 | 0.362 |
Notes: ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. aDemographic variables showed the same results as Table 2. bHCC referred to hair cortisol content. cDA×HCC referred to the interaction between deep acting and hair cortisol contents.