Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;3(1):36. doi: 10.5334/joc.125

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects from outnumbering and forewarning on damage from science denialism in public discussions in Experiment 2. The results reveal a significant mitigation in damage from denialism on all outcome measures when forewarning was used. The mitigating effect was not a function of whether the advocate uses a rebuttal or remains silent. Comparison of the lower (3:3) and upper (5:1) panels reveals no evidence that outnumbering mitigated the damage from denialism on any outcome measure. The y-axes represent mean changes in attitude (left graph), intention (centre graph) and confidence (right graph) in POMP values. Descriptive data are provided in Supplementary Tables 2–4. The x-axes represent experimental conditions. Error bars represent 95% CIs. Dots indicate changes in individual participants’ outcome measures.