Table 2.
Unique citations across all papers included in the review
| Author | # of papers | # unique | % unique |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angus, Cairns, Purves, Bryce, MacDonald & Gordon (2013) [37] | 61 | 60 | 98.4 |
| Bish & Michie (2010) [38] | 26 | 8 | 30.8 |
| Bish & Michie (2011) [39] | 12 | 8 | 66.7 |
| Bish, Michie, & Yardley (2011) [40] | 24 | 3 | 12.5 |
| Bish, Yardley, Nicoll & Michie (2011) [41] | 37 | 6 | 16.2 |
| Bults, Beaujean, Richardus & Voeten (2015) [44] | 70 | 34 | 48.6 |
| Corace, Srigley, Hargadon, Yu, MacDonald, Fabrigar, & Garber (2016) | 10 | 9 | 90.0 |
| Ejeta, Ardalan & Paton (2015) [45] | 33 | 32 | 97.0 |
| Leppin & Aro (2009) [46] | 30 | 17 | 56.7 |
| Omori, Kuligowski, Butler, & Gwynne (2017)a [52] | 58 | 57 | 98.3 |
| Prematunge, Corace, McCarthy, Nair, Pugsley & Garber (2012) [48] | 20 | 12 | 60.0 |
| Schmid, Rauber, Betsch, Lidolt & Denker (2017)b [51] | 508 | 485 | 95.5 |
| Westcott, Ronan, Bambrick, & Taylor (2017)a [53] | 101 | 101 | 100.0 |
| AVERAGE | 66.9 |
aAs this was not a systematic review, the full reference list was searched
bAlthough the authors indicate that 470 papers were included in the review, no list of these papers was provided. Given this, the full reference list of 508 citations was searched