Table 3.
Barriers to LCS Dissemination and Implementation
| Eligibility assessment | • Screening guidelines do not account for racial, ethnic, sex, or socioeconomic differences in smoking behaviors or lung cancer risk |
| • Guidelines may not be optimized for PLHIV | |
| • Screening varies by insurance status | |
| • Inaccurate tobacco pack-years history | |
| • Discordance between EHR smoking history and actual tobacco pack-years history preventing referral | |
| SDM | • Shared decision aids may not be appropriate for populations with limited health literacy or SMI and may not be available in different languages |
| • Individuals may not understand numeracy concepts for informed decision-making | |
| Healthcare-system and provider level | • Multidisciplinary buy-in for implementation |
| • Investment by health systems in additional resources (personnel, information technology, etc.) | |
| • Provider time constraints preventing SDM | |
| • Level of provider familiarity with LCS eligibility criteria and SDM requirements | |
| • Implicit bias and differences in trust and perception based on sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status | |
| Patient level | • Individuals who smoke tend to be less educated and less likely to have a PCP, reducing access to LCS |
| • Smoking carries a stigma, with many who smoke having a high level of nihilism | |
| • Cost and lack of health insurance | |
| • Travel to LCS facility | |
| • Medical mistrust | |
| Geographic location | • An inverse relationship exists between individuals at highest risk for lung cancer and availability of accredited LCS programs |
| • The southeastern United States has a disproportionately low number of accredited sites compared with the number of individuals who smoke and are at risk for lung cancer |
Definition of abbreviations: EHR = electronic health record; LCS = lung cancer screening; PCP = primary care provider; PLHIV = people living with HIV; SDM = shared decision-making; SMI = serious mental illness.