Table 4. Conservation assessment for 11 Neotropical taxa of plants and animals based on three datasets.
IUCN: global Red List assessment obtained from http://www.iucn.org; GBIF Raw: preliminary conservation assessment based on IUCN Criterion B using ConR and the raw dataset from GBIF; GBIF filtered: preliminary conservation assessment based on IUCN Criterion B using ConR and the filtered dataset. Only taxa with at least one species evaluated by IUCN shown.
| IUCN | GBIF Raw | GBIF Filtered | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxon | n taxa | Evaluated [%] | Threatened [%] | n taxa | Threatened [%] | Match with IUCN [%] | n taxa | Threatened [%] | Match with IUCN [%] | EOO change compared to raw [%] | AOO change compared to raw [%] |
| Arhynchobatidae | 37 | 51.3 | 17.9 | 39 | 35.9 | 45.0 | 39 | 41.0 | 40.0 | −32.7 | −18.5 |
| Dipsadidae | 520 | 68.0 | 8.8 | 638 | 58.3 | 63.0 | 598 | 59.9 | 61.2 | −2.3 | −15.6 |
| Harengula | 4 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 4 | 0.0 | 100.0 | −38.0 | −36.9 |
| Conchocarpus | 4 | 8.7 | 0.0 | 46 | 63.0 | 100.0 | 45 | 62.2 | 100.0 | −15.3 | −7.1 |
| Gaylussacia | 2 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 61 | 59.0 | 50.0 | 58 | 60.3 | 50.0 | −22.5 | −8.6 |
| Harpalyce | 3 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 20 | 65.0 | 66.7 | 17 | 58.8 | 50.0 | −18.4 | −16.5 |
| Iridaceae | 13 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 531 | 64.4 | 50.0 | 466 | 62.9 | 62.5 | −18.2 | −12.3 |
| Lepismium | 6 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 16.7 | 83.3 | 6 | 16.7 | 83.3 | −33.9 | −7.9 |
| Pilosocereus | 41 | 80.9 | 19.1 | 47 | 55.3 | 73.7 | 46 | 56.5 | 71.1 | −8.5 | −5.8 |
| Tillandsia | 54 | 11.6 | 6.0 | 464 | 61.4 | 85.2 | 453 | 62.7 | 83.3 | −13.7 | −9.9 |
| Tocoyena | 3 | 13.6 | 4.5 | 22 | 31.8 | 66.7 | 21 | 38.1 | 66.7 | −23.0 | −9.5 |