Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;619:118756. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118756

Table 1.

Average surface potential (SP) and particle removal efficiency (PRE) of FFP2 and FFP3 FFRs at different irradiation doses [24]. The quoted uncertainties represent the observed standard deviation. There is only one measurement of recharged FFRs presented in the table due to different SP values of each recharged FFRs.

* - filters that were recharged with a negative surface potential, ** - filters that were recharged with a positive surface potential.

Dose (kGy) Surface Potential (kV) Particle removal efficiency (%)
Gamma E-beam Gamma E-beam
0 −0.4 ± 0.1 99.50.9+0.5
FFP2 10
20
50
20*
20**
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
−0.2 ± 0.2
−2.3 ± 0.3
2.1 ± 0.2
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
−2.3 ± 0.3
2.1 ± 0.2
83.4 ± 0.8
87 ± 10
87 ± 1
99.4
98.5
84 ± 2
82 ± 2
86 ± 4
98.7
97.9
0 −0.6 ± 0.2 1000.05+0.0
FFP3 10
20
50
20*
20**
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
−2.8 ± 0.3
1.9 ± 0.2
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
|SP| ˂ 0.1
−2.2 ± 0.3
1.9 ± 0.2
90 ± 2
91 ± 2
91 ± 2
97.1
98.7
92 ± 1
91 ± 1
91 ± 3
99.7
99.7