Table 2.
Allocators’ expected net Reward for each possible allocation choice
Dependent variable: net Reward |
||
---|---|---|
(1) Equal conditions | (2) Unequal conditions | |
Give to A/B | − 0.30 | |
(0.24) | ||
Give to poor | 0.90*** | |
(0.22) | ||
Give to rich | 0.25 | |
(0.27) | ||
Constant | 0.51*** | −0.21 |
(0.16) | (0.14) | |
Mean of dep. variable | 0.32 | 0.17 |
Give to A/B + constant | 0.22*** | |
(s.e.) | (0.08) | |
Give to poor + constant | 0.69*** | |
(s.e.) | (0.14) | |
Give to rich + constant | 0.04 | |
(s.e.) | (0.17) | |
F stat: give to poor = give to rich | 5.67 | |
p value | 0.02** | |
Observations | 840 | 1680 |
Allocators’ expected net Reward or each possible allocation choice. The constant term captures allocators’ net Reward for randomization. Regressions control for individual level fixed effects; standard errors are heteroskedasticity-robust and clustered at the group level. In column (1) the linear combination of β1 and β0 captures allocators’ expected net Reward for direct allocation to either Recipient A or Recipient B in the equal endowment conditions. In column (2) the linear combination of β1 and β0 captures allocators’ expected net Reward for direct allocation to the relatively poorer recipient in the unequal endowment conditions, and the linear combination of β2 and β0 captures allocators’ expected net Reward for direct allocation to the relatively richer recipient in the unequal endowment conditions. The F statistics and corresponding p values for a Wald test of coefficient equality between β1 and β2 in the unequal endowment conditions are also reported in the lower panel of the table.
Significant at the 10% confidence level,
significant at the 5% confidence level,
significant at the 1% confidence level