Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Choice Welfare. 2019 Jan 24;52(4):709–739. doi: 10.1007/s00355-018-1168-7

Table 8.

Effects of recipients’ absolute endowments on their reward/punishment behavior

Dependent variable: Reward
(1) Give to me (2) Give to other (3) Randomize
Poor 0.01 − 0.36*** − 0.49***
(0.11) (0.13) (0.16)
Rich − 0.03 0.34** − 0.25**
(0.13) (0.16) (0.12)
High endowment − 0.21** 0.02 − 0.03
(0.08) (0.08) (0.08)
Poor × high endowment 0.13 0.14 0.04
(0.12) (0.12) (0.15)
Rich × high endowment 0.27 0.09 −0.01
(0.17) (0.10) (0.16)
Constant 1.01*** − 0.69*** 0.27***
(0.07) (0.08) (0.08)
Mean of dep. variable 0.96 − 0.65 0.01
F stat: high endowment 2.64 1.85 0.12
p value 0.06* 0.15 0.95
Observations 840 840 840

Effects of recipients’ absolute endowments on their reward/punishment behavior. The constant term captures recipients’ average reward/punishment behavior in the equal wealth condition with low endowments. Regressions control for individual level fixed effects; standard errors are heteroskedasticity-robust and clustered at the participant level. F statistics and corresponding p values from a Wald test of joint significance of β3, β4 and β5 for each regression are reported below the table.

*

Significant at the 10% confidence level,

**

significant at the 5% confidence level,

***

significant at the 1% confidence level