Table 8.
Effects of recipients’ absolute endowments on their reward/punishment behavior
| Dependent variable: Reward |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Give to me | (2) Give to other | (3) Randomize | |
| Poor | 0.01 | − 0.36*** | − 0.49*** |
| (0.11) | (0.13) | (0.16) | |
| Rich | − 0.03 | 0.34** | − 0.25** |
| (0.13) | (0.16) | (0.12) | |
| High endowment | − 0.21** | 0.02 | − 0.03 |
| (0.08) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
| Poor × high endowment | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
| (0.12) | (0.12) | (0.15) | |
| Rich × high endowment | 0.27 | 0.09 | −0.01 |
| (0.17) | (0.10) | (0.16) | |
| Constant | 1.01*** | − 0.69*** | 0.27*** |
| (0.07) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
| Mean of dep. variable | 0.96 | − 0.65 | 0.01 |
| F stat: high endowment | 2.64 | 1.85 | 0.12 |
| p value | 0.06* | 0.15 | 0.95 |
| Observations | 840 | 840 | 840 |
Effects of recipients’ absolute endowments on their reward/punishment behavior. The constant term captures recipients’ average reward/punishment behavior in the equal wealth condition with low endowments. Regressions control for individual level fixed effects; standard errors are heteroskedasticity-robust and clustered at the participant level. F statistics and corresponding p values from a Wald test of joint significance of β3, β4 and β5 for each regression are reported below the table.
Significant at the 10% confidence level,
significant at the 5% confidence level,
significant at the 1% confidence level