Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 11;9(4):232–237. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_13_20

Table 1.

Comparisons between the first and second EUS-FNA training steps using the novel swine model

Variable First step Second step P
Procedure time* 40.9±9.0 23.8±4.5 <0.001
Success rate 56.7% (17/30) 86.7% (26/30) 0.020
Accuracy rate 43.3% (13/30) 76.7% (23/30) 0.017
Safety rate 30.0% (9/30) 56.7% (17/30) 0.067

*Data are presented as mean±SD. Bold text indicates a statistically significant difference. SD: Standard deviation