Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239416

Fig 18. Test 4: Comparison between FOM and DL-ROM solutions for different testing-parameter instances.

Fig 18

APs obtained through the FOM and the DL-ROM with n = 4. Left: μtest1=(12.9·0.1125cm2/ms,12.9·0.0737cm2/ms,0.1625) and μtest2=(12.9·0.1125cm2/ms,12.9·0.0737cm2/ms,0.2375); right: μtest1=(12.9·0.0775cm2/ms,12.9·0.0387cm2/ms,0.2125) and μtest2=(12.9·0.1825cm2/ms,12.9·.0912cm2/ms,0.2125). The DL-ROM approximation accurately reproduces the APD variability and the different depolarization patterns.