Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;61(12):1349–1359. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13224

Table 1.

Risk ratios for associations between a polygenic score for age‐at‐first‐birth and reproductive behaviors

Outcome a Pooled E‐Risk and Dunedin cohorts (N = 2,917)
Analytic N Cases (%) Baseline p‐Value b Cohen's d c Pearson's r c Adjusted for SES p‐Value Adjusted for maternal AFB p‐Value Adjusted for SES and maternal AFB p‐Value
Intercourse 2,736 1,982 (72.4) 1.06 [1.04–1.09] <.001 .21 .10 1.05 [1.03–1.08] <.001 1.05 [1.02–1.07] <.001 1.04 [1.02–1.07] <.001
Pregnancy 2,734 248 (9.1) 1.25 [1.12‐1.41] <.001 .17 .08 1.17 [1.04–1.32] .008 1.14 [1.02–1.28] .024 1.12 [1.00–1.26] .057
Birth 2,737 76 (2.8) 1.25 [0.99–1.59] .065 .08 .04 1.12 [0.88–1.42] .355 1.10 [0.88–1.39] .402 1.05 [0.83–1.33] .684

The polygenic score was reverse‐coded. Analyses were restricted to the Caucasian samples (E‐Risk: N = 1,999, Dunedin: N = 918). Models controlled for sex and cohort/study. Brackets indicate 95% confidence intervals. AFB, age‐at‐first‐birth; SES, childhood socioeconomic status.

a

Binary variables, coded to reflect whether participants had met each reproductive milestone by age 18 or younger.

b

Our analysis prioritizes the reporting of effect sizes and their uncertainty; however, we also report p‐values for full disclosure. The Bonferroni‐adjusted p‐value for tests of baseline associations is .017.

c

Average effect size across three approaches used to account for the clustering of E‐Risk twins within families. All approaches produced very similar estimates, available on request from the corresponding author.