Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;61(12):1349–1359. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13224

Table 3.

Associations between polygenic scores for age‐at‐first‐birth and disinhibitory behaviors in two birth cohorts

Outcome Effect size E‐Risk cohort (N = 1,999) Dunedin cohort (N = 918)
Age assessed (years) N Mean [SD] or n (%) Association p‐Value a Cohen's d b Pearson's r b Age assessed (years) N Mean [SD] or n (%) Association p‐Value a Cohen's d Pearson's r
Primary outcomes c
Low childhood self‐control d β 5–10 1,999 0.01 [0.99] .07 [.02–.12] .006 .15 .08 3–11 918 −0.02 [0.95] .12 [.06–.18] <.001 .25 .13
Externalizing liability e β 18 1,863 0.01 [1.00] .08 [.03–.13] .004 .17 .08 18–38 918 −0.03 [0.98] .08 [.02–.14] .015 .16 .08
Criminal offending RR 10–22 1,857 n = 208 (11.2%) 1.16 [1.01–1.33] .039 .12 .06 14–38 898 n = 238 (26.5%) 1.18 [1.04–1.34] .010 .17 .09
Substance dependence RR 18 1,860 n = 413 (22.2%) 1.14 [1.04–1.24] .006 .16 .08 38 886 n = 165 (18.6%) 1.19 [1.02–1.38] .028 .15 .07
Informant‐reported disinhibition f β 18 1,851 0.01 [1.01] .07 [.02–.12] .007 .16 .08 38 873 −0.02 [0.98] .02 [−.04–.09] .501 .05 .02
Secondary outcome c
Lifetime number of sexual partners IRR 18 1,810 1.90 [2.00] 1.12 [1.06–1.18] <.001 .25 .12 38 914 17.39 [15.18] 1.07 [1.01–1.14] .016 .16 .08

The polygenic score was reverse‐coded. Analyses were restricted to the Caucasian samples (E‐Risk: N = 1,999, Dunedin: N = 918). Models controlled for sex. Brackets indicate 95% confidence intervals. β, standardized regression coefficient; IRR, incidence rate ratio; RR, risk ratio.

a

Our analysis prioritizes the reporting of effect sizes and their uncertainty; however, we also report p‐values for full disclosure. Within each cohort, the Bonferroni‐adjusted p‐value for tests of associations with primary outcomes is .010.

b

Average effect size across three approaches used to account for the clustering of twins within families. All approaches produced very similar estimates, available on request from the corresponding author.

c

Primary outcomes were prespecified. Secondary outcome was added in response to peer review.

d

The self‐control factor was standardized (M = 0, SD = 1) within the full samples (E‐Risk: N = 2,232, Dunedin: N = 1,037). Higher scores indicate lower levels of self‐control.

e

The externalizing liability factor was standardized (M = 0, SD = 1) within the full sample of E‐Risk participants at age 18 (N = 2,066) and the full sample of Dunedin participants with externalizing data for at least one assessment between ages 18 and 38 (N = 1,000).

f

Informant‐reported disinhibition was standardized (M = 0, SD = 1) within the full samples of participants with informant‐report data (E‐Risk: N = 2,052, Dunedin: N = 934).