Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;11:4923. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18694-0

Fig. 3. Biophysical ambiguity prevents phenotype prediction.

Fig. 3

ac PR expression when combining two mutations that affect either protein folding (Mutation A) or another biophysical parameter (Mutation B) but not both: dimerization (a), DNA binding (b) or tetramerization (c). Number (left) and range (right) of possible double mutant PR phenotypes (left). df Examples showing how a mutation with a known phenotype combines with other mutations, leading to 1 to 4 possible double mutant PR expression levels. gi Number (left) and range (right) of double mutant PRM expression levels when mutations can affect folding or another biophysical parameter. jl Examples showing how a mutation with a known PRM phenotype can combine with other mutations to result in many different PRM phenotypes. m, n Maximum number (left) and range (right) of double mutant phenotypes when two mutations can each affect one of the indicated number of different biophysical properties. Horizontal lines denote the mean of the data points. n = 4, 6, 4 and 1, respectively, for the groups with number of possible biophysical parameters equal to 1, 2, 3 and 4. Source data are provided as a Source data file.